You're facing resistance from a team member on new automotive software. How will you navigate this challenge?
Dive into the dynamics of team discord—how do you turn conflict into collaboration?
You're facing resistance from a team member on new automotive software. How will you navigate this challenge?
Dive into the dynamics of team discord—how do you turn conflict into collaboration?
-
I will have a 1-1 conversation with the team member to understand their objections and challenges. They might be concerned about the complexity, current work disruption, or simply unfamiliarity with the software. And I’d facilitate a knowledge transfer session, providing hands-on training and pair them with someone who has already embraced the tool, helping them ease into the change. Still if the resistance persists and negatively impacts the team’s performance, it may be necessary for me to involve higher management to resolve the issue while maintaining professional and supportive communication.
-
Have an intense conversation with the person and understand why. Very often these persons are right and just have the balls to say “NO” instead of saying yes to everything that comes from above. Btw, software is very rarely the solution anyway. Be careful with quick decisions. Sorry that I am not answering in the possibly desired direction.
-
In my opinion understanding the nature of resistance is important. If the new software is not meeting the core requirement or the technical advancement required for operations, the resistance is justified. If the issue is about unfamiliarity or lack of acceptance, then UAT can be offered.
-
The first step to navigate this challenge is to have a one-on-one discussion with concerned person, understand the perspective and the reasons behind the resistance. While sometimes the resistance points can provide a different outlook, issue analysis opportunity, it can also be that the person may need deeper understanding of the software. At the end of the day, there should be the common goal of achieving the desired outcome in an efficient manner. Keeping that in mind, discussions, analysis and understanding the automotive software and perspectives would be able to pave the way for navigating through a challenge.
-
To navigate resistance from a team member on new automotive software, I would first listen to their concerns to understand the root of the issue. Acknowledging their perspective helps build trust and opens up a dialogue. I would then highlight the benefits of the software, showing how it enhances efficiency or performance for the team. Offering training or support might ease their transition and reduce reluctance. Lastly, I’d encourage feedback throughout the implementation process to ensure the team member feels involved and heard, fostering a collaborative environment.
-
Uniformity should never be required. Any team member should be comfortable to express their opinion "for" or "against". Current culture seems to preach uniformity with no variance from the "party-line". All disagreements need to be vetted. Understand why your team members are paid. It is exactly for their opinion/understanding. Not for them to agree incessantly. All that said: once the disagreement is critiqued, the team should determine the path forward, whether any modifications are necessary.
-
When facing resistance to new automotive software, it's essential to listen first and understand the team member's concerns. Provide proper training and demonstrate how the software enhances efficiency and quality. Show patience and offer support to ease the transition, while highlighting the benefits it brings to both the individual and the team. Creating a collaborative environment encourages open dialogue and helps build trust in adopting new tools.
-
Have a conversation to establish the reasons for the resistance. Compile a list of the concerns and now get the group together to discuss these, you might find that there are others with the same issues, but not comfortable expressing their resistance. The key is to give this team member the ability to voice their concerns within the group and not allow them to be labelled as the "always negative". Sometimes they are the realistic ones in the group, and it is wake up call for us all as we get too complacent accepting that the new version is always better.
-
In this case, a slightly more detailed analysis is necessary and some observations are necessary: 1- How many members does the team have? If the team, for example, has one hundred members, rejection would be 1%, very low and convincing would be easier. 2- What is the influence of this member on the group? If the influence is great, perhaps the best way is group convincing. 3- What is this member’s accumulated experience? If he is experienced, perhaps he is right, so implementing a tool that does not add value would not be smart. 4- How many others on the team, even though they didn't initially speak out, are also against it? If others, with more opportunity to speak, are against it, once again the convincing must be done in a group.
-
I would like to first understand the reason for the resistance of the team member, hence would hear it from the team member with empathy. Then clarify the goal of this automotive software for the organisation and business point of view to come to an alignment. Making the team member realise the importance of the software deliverable and how his contribution towards the software would have an impact towards the goal is the key to resolving conflict or navigating difficult situations
Rate this article
More relevant reading
-
Collaborative LeadershipHow do you communicate and align the vision and goals of cross-functional and multidisciplinary teams?
-
Research and Development (R&D)How can you develop cross-functional collaboration skills?
-
Cross-functional Team LeadershipWhat are the steps to create a cross-functional team charter?
-
Business NetworkingHow do you negotiate the terms and expectations of a collaboration agreement?