If there is a conflicting test result between developers and QA, it means the product has passed the test by the developers but failed it by the QA. First the QA should review the test report of the developers and retest some more times (ensuring identical test and environmental conditions) to check the reproducibility. If there are still any problems, the QA should arrange a joint meeting with the developers and report the test procedure and results. The developers are then responsible to deal with the problem, according to the problem resolution procedure.

To reconcile conflicting QA and developer test results, immediately organize a meeting with both teams to review discrepancies. Ensure clear documentation of the test cases, environments, and methodologies used. Identify common ground or gaps, and assign a neutral party or senior technical resource to revalidate critical scenarios. Foster open communication, emphasizing collaboration over blame. Set a clear timeline for resolving the discrepancies and document agreed-upon actions to maintain accountability.

Formulate a joint evaluation process starting from sampling till sample testing and final result generation step by step to give confidence of evaluation as per standard processes. Also, it could be proved through Inter Laboratory Calibration (ILC). Same sample could be tested in other standard laboratories and results can be compared.

Joint analysis should be organized between both stakeholders ( Quality assurance and Developers), this would make them see where the problem really lies and how to combat it going forward. It would also allow them to come up with a uniform standard operating procedure (S.O.P).

First of all Dev and QA team should have enough understanding of requirements. Now QA created test case should be gone through by David team and they also created their own unit level cases. Still the gap in test result then one review meeting needs to arrange and can both team can discuss each noted points transplantly.

When facing conflicting test results between QA and developers, I focus on collaboration and root cause analysis to resolve the differences. I start by reproducing the issue in a shared environment to eliminate environmental discrepancies. Next, I arrange a joint session with QA, developers, and relevant stakeholders to review logs, test data, and steps. This ensures alignment on the testing approach and expected outcomes. If needed, I validate results using tools or automation to maintain objectivity. By fostering open communication, documenting findings, and focusing on facts, we reconcile differences efficiently and ensure accurate, reliable test results that align with product requirements.

The fastest method. Quickly Identify the test matrix whether both parties having same version with same testing parameters. If Yes, Next. Review the test result. Choose the closest result to history, golden refference. Then , investigate the why the false result happen. No need for retest. Carry to next process until delivery without impact customer expect leadtime.

When faced with conflicting test results between QA and developers, it's crucial to establish clear communication and collaboration. Both teams should review the discrepancies together, ensuring everyone understands the testing procedures and expectations. Reproducing the issues is key – having both teams witness the same behavior helps pinpoint the root cause. Openly discussing potential solutions and agreeing on a resolution strategy is essential to ensure alignment and prevent future conflicts.