You're caught between air traffic control and ground operations. How do you handle conflicting instructions?
When you're caught between air traffic control (ATC) and ground operations, it can feel like you're juggling with fire. To manage this efficiently, focus on harmonizing communication and decision-making:
How do you handle conflicting instructions in your role?
You're caught between air traffic control and ground operations. How do you handle conflicting instructions?
When you're caught between air traffic control (ATC) and ground operations, it can feel like you're juggling with fire. To manage this efficiently, focus on harmonizing communication and decision-making:
How do you handle conflicting instructions in your role?
-
Conflicting instructions must be avoided! Clear procedures shall be implemented as well as clearly defined areas of competency. Implement an apron management service with clear competencies!
-
At the very first, airport operator need to establish a SOP to handle high traffic situation. While setting the SOP a collaborative decision making approach with all stakeholders is foremost, where high priority & less priority factor should be defined clearly. A log entry of action taken on such situation should be recorded. Any risk consequence due to hazard shall be notified.
-
First, the Airport shall implement Airport Enterprise Management Centre (AEMC) with ACDM (Airport Collaborative Decision Making). So, the Airline/GH personnel present in the AEMC will coordinate for smooth Flight/passenger handling. This will avoid any conflicts and mis-communication. Of course a proper SOP to be placed for to achieve On Time Performance (OTP).
-
1. Always Stay Calm: Maintain composure to think clearly and make rational decisions. 2.Confirm receipt of both sets of instructions to ensure that all parties are aware of the situation. 3.If possible, seek clarification from both ATC and ground operations about their instructions. 4.Always prioritize safety above all else. 5. In most cases, ATC has the final authority when it comes to aircraft movement in controlled airspace, so follow their instructions unless there is an immediate safety concern. 6.Inform ground operations of your actions based on ATC's guidance, explaining the situation clearly. 7.Keep a record of all communications for accountability and future reference. 8.After resolving the immediate conflict, report the incident
-
In aviation, it is the responsibility of all individuals to intervene upon identifying a potentially hazardous situation. The following steps are advised: 1. Abstain from making impulsive or premature decisions. 2. Recognize and address any communication deficiencies by requesting explicit verbal clarification. 3. Ascertain the entity with the highest authority, communicate that the information has been conveyed through a secondary authority, and verify the plausibility and accuracy of the information.
-
When caught between conflicting instructions from air traffic control and ground operations, I follow a structured approach. Firstly, I acknowledge and clarify both instructions, ensuring a 95% understanding of the requirements Secondly, I assess the situation using the DECIDE model, evaluating 80% of the factors within 2 minutes Lastly, I prioritize safety and communicate my decision to both parties, resulting in a 99% resolution rate By doing so, I minimize delays and ensure a 25% reduction in operational errors.
-
In my role within aviation/airport management, handling conflicting instructions requires a structured and safety-driven approach. Here’s how I navigate such situations: 1. Prioritize Safety: Safety is non-negotiable. I immediately evaluate which instruction has the most direct impact on the safety of aircraft, crew, and ground personnel. 2. Clarify Instructions: I quickly and professionally request clarification from both Air Traffic Control (ATC) and ground operations to identify the root of the conflict. Clear, calm communication helps resolve misunderstandings.
-
Well as this can happen often, it is pretty clear, ATC has the authority. Each person should be testing on this at least annually and know it well. Be crystal clear in your communications with both. I would explain to OPS the situation with ATC and hopefully if needs to be resolved, they can resolve it. As a former airport fire chief, we had great relationships with both groups as well as maintenance. We met monthly for breakfast to build the relationship and maintain it while keeping each other informed. If ever an issue, we could quickly work it out because of our already built and trusted relationships.
-
Air traffic control (ATC) involves several stages, each managing different phases of an aircraft's journey based on its distance from the airport. These stages ensure safe and efficient movement of aircraft from departure to arrival. Such stages are Ground Control (ground movements), Tower Control (takeoff and landing), Approach Control (vectors for approach, climb and descent instructions, and transitioning), En-route Control (routing, altitude changes, and coordinating). Hence, there is no conflicts of ground control and air traffic control, by design. Further, ASMGCS, Ground Radar and associated Automation Systems offer controllers a comprehensive view of the entire airfield, improving their situational awareness to avoid any conflict.
-
Air traffic controller would have the up to date information as to what is taking place. Communication between the two could resolve any problems.
Rate this article
More relevant reading
-
GMDSSWhat are the common errors or pitfalls of using DSC on VHF channels?
-
AviationYou're facing a miscommunication with air traffic control. How will you prevent a potential conflict?
-
AviationHow can you increase situational awareness during takeoff and landing?
-
AviationYou're facing peak traffic hours with multiple aircraft. How do you guarantee effective communication?