I would share my latest experience based in Lencioni’s model focuses on developing high-performing teams through five key behaviors which I recommended to be explored i.e Trust, Conflict, Commitment, Accountability and Results in every single day, no doubts that I will see you performing like winner into a HPO.

Struggling with conflicting opinions on project risks? try this: 1. Risk War Room: Have team members pitch their risk perspectives in brief, structured arguments, ensuring everyone is heard. 2. Data Detective Challenge: Assign someone to gather evidence-backed insights, separating real risks from assumptions. 3. Micro-Experiment: Test both low and high-risk strategies on a small project part for real-world insights. 4. Risk Spectrum Visual: Map out everyone’s risk perceptions for a quick overview of positions. 5. Rotate Devil’s Advocate: Assign someone to challenge ideas, preventing groupthink. Structured debates, data-driven insights & critical questioning can transform conflicting opinions into a balanced, risk-aware strategy.

When my team faced differing opinions on risk for a new project, we found success through structured, open discussions where each member could voice their concerns and ideas. We also used data-driven analysis to keep the decision grounded in objective factors, showing potential impacts and benefits based on past projects and market trends. To balance caution and progress, we opted for a phased approach—starting with a pilot phase that allowed us to test key elements and adjust our strategy as needed. This incremental approach not only helped address concerns but also built confidence, gradually aligning the team toward a common goal.

When my team is divided on risk levels for a new project, I create space for everyone to present their perspectives, ensuring all voices are heard. I then focus on aligning decisions with our overall goals by weighing the potential risks against the expected outcomes. Where possible, I find a middle ground by introducing phased approaches or testing smaller components first. Ultimately, the key is making informed decisions collaboratively, with clarity on why the chosen path serves our vision best.

Conflicting opinions can be addressed by good conflict management skills and bringing everyone to collaborate and get a consensus by taking scientific risk analysis process based on criticality of stakes involved.

Encourage open and honest discussion to understand everyone's perspective. Use data and a clear framework to assess and prioritize risks objectively. Collaborate on mitigation strategies and communicate decisions transparently. Regularly review and adapt your approach as the project evolves. A shared understanding of risk leads to better decisions and a higher chance of success.

When your team is divided on risk levels, effective navigation requires fostering open dialogue and aligning on priorities. Here’s how to handle differing opinions: Facilitate Open Discussion: Create a space where each team member can express their concerns and reasoning, ensuring all perspectives are heard. Evaluate Risks Objectively: Analyze the risks by impact and probability, using data to ground the conversation and remove bias. Align on Project Goals: Focus on shared objectives, weighing risks against project benefits to make informed decisions. Seek Compromise: If feasible, find middle-ground solutions that address key concerns without stalling progress.

Whenever there are conflicting opinions, try to get people on the same page while constantly learning from the collaborative ongoing discussions - Every situation is unique so there is no one answer fits all. - Data+facts are the key so I always back all the discussions with those - Discussions can be with all members in one group or they can be in smaller groups/ 1:1 ( whichever works per the situation). - If the team is not agreeing to a single consensus for the entire proposed task, then phasing out may work . I propose, Let's try and deliver phase 1,if phase1 gives the right results then we can move to phase 2, else we stop. - Collaborative discussions can be eye openers, so always go with a fresh mind to pivot if needed.

- Risk Mapping Workshop: Conduct a workshop for the team to map risks by likelihood and impact collaboratively. - Creating a “Risk Ownership” Matrix: Assign each risk to a team member or subgroup. This ensures accountability and encourages realistic risk assessment. - Scenario Planning: Outline potential scenarios with their best and worst-case outcomes. This helps the team identify critical versus manageable risks and find common ground when opinions differ. - Encourage Diverse Roles in Risk Reviews: Involving people from diverse backgrounds not tied to the project can provide fresh insights and enhance objectivity, helping to balance perspectives.