When my team is divided on research methodologies, I encourage open discussions to understand each perspective. We explore combining elements from different methodologies to create a hybrid approach that satisfies everyone. If necessary, we bring in an external expert to provide unbiased advice and mediate differences.

Here’s how I handle it: Open Discussion: Facilitate a meeting to discuss preferred methods and reasoning, fostering mutual understanding. Align Goals: Shift focus to common objectives like user satisfaction or data accuracy. Evaluate Approaches: Objectively compare methods based on time, cost, and relevance to depersonalize the debate. Hybrid Solution: Consider a mixed approach to integrate diverse perspectives and strengthen results. Pilot & Reflect: Test methods on a small scale, gather feedback, and refine before full implementation. Document & Align: Create a research guide to ensure consistency and clarity for future projects.
Collaboration and compromise lead to solutions that best serve the team and project.

Open discussions are very important for contextualization and alignment around the objective, but they are only efficient with very clear guidance on the criteria being evaluated. I usually use Strategyzer's test cards to support the discussion when the topic is very divergent. With them, we can weigh and compare effort, reliability and results of each of the possible method possibilities.

La definición del objetivo común fortalece el desarrrollo de una metodología en equipo, si todos tenemos el mismo objetivo, a pesar de tomar caminos diferentes podemos culminarlo, la clave es identificar las fortalezas y aventurarse en pro de ello

Defining Goals We started with team discussions to define the study’s objectives, create questions, and identify the target users involved. Collaboration with stakeholders Once the study framework was ready, we reached out to our team, chief designer, and senior researchers for feedback on the questions and prototype. Their input was crucial in aligning our approach with both user needs and business goals. Challenges Due to credit constraints, we used internal team members for testing and opted for an unmoderated usability test to observe user decisions naturally. By fostering open dialogue, iterating on feedback, and adapting to challenges, we delivered valuable insights while ensuring team alignment.

Divided opinions come from miss understanding . 1. understand opinions and the complexity behind all of them 2. Clarify the context and the need, each use case have an appropriate solution 3. Then use the appropriate tools to build the best methodologie

Here is how I would approach Focusing on shared goals i.e by emphasizing the common aim of answering questions Encouraging open dialogue and letting everyone explaining their own approach Running small testing to compare methods in practice Considering practical constraints like time, resources and stakeholders needs.

When your team is divided on research methodologies, start by aligning on shared goals and objectives for the research. Facilitate open discussions to understand differing perspectives and the rationale behind each preference. Consider combining methodologies or conducting a small pilot to test approaches and evaluate outcomes. Focus on the user’s needs as the ultimate priority, ensuring the chosen methods effectively address them. A collaborative mindset and flexibility can help find common ground.

Bridging the gap between diverse research methodologies requires open communication and a shared objective. Encourage team members to present their preferred methods while highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. Facilitate a discussion where everyone listens actively and asks clarifying questions. Search for common ground by identifying shared objectives and values. For instance, a team divided between qualitative and quantitative approaches might find unity in their mutual desire to understand a complex social issue. By emphasizing shared goals and the complementary nature of different methods, you can create a collaborative and productive research environment.

To resolve disagreements on research methodologies, acknowledge diverse perspectives and revisit the shared research goals. Facilitate open dialogue to discuss each method’s pros and cons, ensuring all voices are heard. If needed, seek expert input or explore a mixed-methods approach to combine strengths. Conduct a small pilot test to evaluate methodologies, then use decision-making tools like voting to reach a consensus. Document the final decision to maintain clarity and alignment. Focusing on collaboration and shared objectives will help the team find common ground.