One thing I have found helpful is to deal the issue with respect and collaboration to figure out a solution. Here’s my approach: 1. Recheck my work: I thoroughly review my data and methods to ensure accuracy and confidence in my findings. 2. Start a conversation: I respectfully share my findings with the colleague to discuss discrepancies, identify gaps, and explore potential explanations. 3. Collaborate on solutions: I suggest joint experiments, methodology reviews, or involving other experts to clarify inconsistencies. 4. Seek external review: If unresolved, I recommend submitting both findings to a peer-reviewed journal or consulting a neutral third party for objective evaluation.

Most importantly is to maintain professionalism and foster a constructive dialogue. Here’s how to handle it: 1. Double-check your research to ensure accuracy. Validate your methodology, data, and results to confidently stand by your findings. 2. Approach your senior colleague respectfully, emphasizing a desire for mutual understanding. 3. Focus on the data and methods rather than personal opinions. Use clear, non-confrontational language to explain your results. 4. Show respect for their experience while maintaining your position. This fosters a collegial atmosphere and opens the door for constructive feedback. 5. Emphasize the importance of advancing knowledge rather than proving someone right or wrong.

Check if there is any differences in methodology, sample size and data collection methods so that you can navigate justifications of the differences

Eu abordaria o conflito com respeito e foco em evidências, sempre. Primeiro, revisaria cuidadosamente ambas as pesquisas para entender as divergências metodológicas e, talvez, estatísticas. Em seguida, promoveria uma discussão aberta com o(s) colega(s), destacando pontos de convergência e explorando como os resultados podem se complementar ou abrir novas linhas de investigação.

When your research conflicts with a senior colleague's findings, approach the situation with respect and open-mindedness. First, ensure that your data and methodology are robust by reviewing your own work carefully. Then, engage your colleague in a constructive discussion to understand their perspective and reasoning. Be open to their feedback, as their experience may highlight areas you might have missed. At the same time, present your findings clearly, focusing on the data and evidence supporting your conclusions. If the disagreement persists, propose further investigation or peer review to clarify the discrepancies and ensure a balanced resolution.