1. Define Specifications Clearly: Ensure the commercial contract specifies the correct standards. 2. Address Stakeholder Differences: Conflicts often arise when the client owner differs from the utility authority. 3. Prioritize Utility Authority Standards: Their specifications should take precedence for O&M purposes. 4. Ensure Compliance: Convince stakeholders to follow legal procedures and correct standards. 5. Avoid Faulty Practices: Prevent issues by rejecting non-compliant specifications.

Conflicts like this should not arise if the project’s commercial contract clearly defines the specifications to be followed. Based on my experience, such issues often occur when the client’s owner is different from the utility authority or service provider. When a project falls under the jurisdiction of a utility authority, their specifications should take precedence, as the network or building will ultimately be handed over to them for future operations and maintenance (O&M). Therefore, I would work to convince both the client and the EPC contractor to adhere to the legal procedures and comply with the correct specifications rather than following faulty ones.

first of all , its common in today's business scenario. So We should not terms it as a clash. it will always happen. so 1) check in contract if any assumption is taken during Bidding Process because of confusion or no clarity from client.2) all those points which were mutually decided but not part of bidding or contract shall be explained.3) Client objective, and point 1 & 2 should become a internal document which shall be explained to Manager & utility time to time. than No Clash.

Follow these steps: Open Communication: Engage in transparent conversations with both parties to understand their perspectives and concerns. Meeting and Mediation: Arrange a meeting to discuss the conflicting issues and focus on collaboration to find a middle ground. Data Presentation: Use data and facts to support your points, highlighting the benefits of each perspective. Compromise and Solutions: Suggest potential compromises or alternative solutions that address both parties' needs. Focus on Goals: Keep the project's overall success and mutual objectives in mind to foster a cooperative environment. By maintaining a balanced approach, you can effectively resolve the conflict and ensure project success.

When a project manager’s directives clash with client specifications in electrical engineering, navigating the conflict requires effective communication, problem-solving skills, and a focus on the project’s overall success. Here’s a step-by-step approach: 1. Understand the Root of the Conflict 2. Analyze the Technical Feasibility 3. Document the Issues 4. Communicate with Both Parties 5. Propose Compromises 6. Involve Stakeholders for Final Decision 7. Prioritize Client Satisfaction 8. Maintain Professionalism By handling the situation with transparency, diplomacy, and a focus on technical excellence, you can navigate the conflict and ensure the project progresses successfully.

It's important to emphasize that conflicts and changes are normal in projects, and they shouldn't be viewed as setbacks but as opportunities to improve. The key to resolving these issues is patience and a clear understanding of the underlying problem. Prioritizing the critical aspects of the project and working collaboratively to find a middle ground that meets the needs of both parties will ensure the project's success. Flexibility and open-mindedness are essential in navigating these challenges.

By balancing communication, compromise, and a clear understanding of each side's priorities, you can successfully navigate situations where project manager directives clash with client specifications.

In order yo avoid any clash with the client the following steps shall be considered: 1. Clear identification for the project scope: this very crucial to identify the project boundaries and objective of the project. 2. Identify stakeholder: by performing a stakeholder register identify the influence and power for each one. 3. Develop the risk register: develop a risk analysis workshop to identify all expected rusks might be affected on the project abd identify the action plan tor each risk. 4. Lesson Learned: identify all lesson learned and apply the applicable LL from other project to ensure further development of the project.

1. Clarify the Conflict: Understand exactly where the discrepancy lies. Is the conflict between the timeline, scope, deliverables, or specific features? Identifying the root cause will help in formulating a solution. 2. Assess Impact: How would the project be affected if you prioritize the project manager’s approach versus the client’s needs? 3. Communicate with Both Parties: Share the concerns, discuss the potential consequences, and work together to understand each other's perspectives. 4. Propose a Balanced Solution: If possible, suggest a middle ground where the project manager’s directive can be adjusted to better meet the client's needs without compromising critical project goals.