When design changes clash with site constraints, start by identifying the specific issues. Evaluate if the changes are essential or can be adjusted. Collaborate with stakeholders like engineers and architects to explore feasible solutions. Modify the design to align with constraints while maintaining project goals. Conduct a feasibility check to ensure viability. Communicate updates to stakeholders for approval, and monitor implementation to ensure smooth integration and adherence to site conditions.

When we call ourselves designers and architects, solving problems with creative solutions is what sets us apart in order to satisfy our clients needs. So a site challenge is actually a good thing as it allows us to create new ideas and bring fresh perspectives to a project.

Any design clashes with site constraints should be discussed in Technical Query report and the Designer & Field engineer & Client shall state their concerns and provide their comment

The designers are well aware of the client's requirements and the existing conditions during the design phase. However, if site conditions or available resources are found to conflict with the design during implementation, adjustments become necessary. In such cases, the issue should be promptly reported to the consultant and client. The contractor should propose alternative solutions supported by a detailed study report. This report, involving input from the consultant engineer, should present evidence-based recommendations for addressing the conflict. Such an approach ensures that design changes are justified, well-documented, and approved efficiently.

There is always a room for adjustments in designs to suit client and environmental needs. so if the design conflits with the non-negotiatiable site limitations then identify the issue to see the impacts it imposes into your design. Discuss with other stake holders about the proposed design changes that you maintain safety and cost if the project

Transparency is key. Communicate openly with all parties involved, including the client, about the challenges and the rationale behind any adjustments. This collaborative problem-solving process often results in innovative outcomes that are both practical and impactful.

One thing I’ve found is that site constraints are not always inflexible. Its just a matter of taking the issues to the powers that be and coming to a solution everyone can get behind.

Depending on the type of development and site constraint, the design professionals need to consider alternatives and seek variance or conditional use permit.

Now a days clash check is done using software, that gives pictorial view of the clash. Thus it is easy for the designer and engineers to modify the clashing portion.