Your data analysis contradicts your manager's expectations. How do you handle their concerns?
When your data analysis contradicts your manager's expectations, it's crucial to address the discrepancy with a balanced approach. Here are some strategies to help navigate this situation:
How do you handle conflicting data at work? Share your insights.
Your data analysis contradicts your manager's expectations. How do you handle their concerns?
When your data analysis contradicts your manager's expectations, it's crucial to address the discrepancy with a balanced approach. Here are some strategies to help navigate this situation:
How do you handle conflicting data at work? Share your insights.
-
It has been many years since I was answering to a manager of any sort, so this one is a bit harder to answer than other questions. But let's turn the question around. If I was a manager and my data team's analysis contradicted my expectations, here's what would I expect: 1. Know that in a purely data-led analysis, there is no space for mutual agreement or compromise. The answer is either right or wrong. 2. Double-check my assumptions with their own to confirm goals/circumstances. 3. Defend their model and challenge my expectations if point #2 is valid. 4. Trust that errors are not uncommon in this field, and I know that well enough to help rather than spite my team to fix errors together. 5. Suggest other alternatives up-front.
-
As a Data Analyst, it is sometimes necessary to remain firm and uphold professionalism without compromise. This ensures that we do not create a bigger problem by providing false analysis in an attempt to solve an issue. The first step is to go through the data again to ensure that I used the correct data and that my analysis is accurate. If the data are correct, I will ask for a meeting with my manager to understand his expectations regarding the analysis and reiterate that my analysis is correct and accurately represents the data provided. If the data are not correct, I will take responsibility for the errors, apologize, and request more time to make the necessary corrections.
-
I would first listen carefully to my manager's concerns, ensuring I fully understand the specific issues. Then, I would review the analysis to identify any errors or assumptions that may have led to discrepancies. If the data analysis is correct, I would explain my approach clearly, providing supporting evidence and addressing any misunderstandings. I'd also be open to feedback and propose solutions or adjustments if needed, while ensuring alignment with the broader goals and expectations of the team. Collaboration and transparency would be key in resolving the situation.
-
I would first double-check my analysis to ensure its accuracy and review the methods and assumptions used. Then, I’d seek to understand my manager’s perspective by asking clarifying questions about their expectations. When presenting my findings, I’d focus on key insights, using clear visuals and framing it as what the data suggests, rather than a contradiction. I’d remain open to feedback, discuss any alternative interpretations, and propose next steps or additional analysis to bridge the gap between the data and expectations.
-
This I do by cycling through the data analysis to ensure that what I arrived at does not warrant my manager being upset or disappointed. If correct I make a point of ensuring that the results are highlighted and explained with the use of graphics to support. I always adapt my conversation in a way that would alleviate them regarding such issues, pointing out that even when it provides new inputs, it helps to build value. Maintaining work in progress (WIP) control, I incorporate the feedback I receive to improve it. I have best advice, advice related to organizational objectives, and highlight summary of discussions. It contributes to professionalism, interactive teamwork as well as prudent decision making on the part of everyone involved.
-
When my analysis contradicts a manager’s expectations, I approach the situation with professionalism and an open mind. First, I ensure my data is accurate and well-supported by evidence. Then, I schedule a discussion to present my findings, framing it as an opportunity to explore new insights rather than a conflict. I listen actively to their concerns, seeking to understand their perspective and align it with the data. By focusing on collaboration and offering actionable recommendations, I turn potential disagreement into a productive dialogue. Respect, transparency, and a solution-oriented mindset build trust and pave the way for better decisions.
-
In a recent project, my analysis contradicted my manager's expectations, revealing unexpected trends in customer behavior. I ensured my findings were well-organized and backed by solid evidence, which helped build credibility during discussions. By engaging in open dialogue, I worked to align perspectives and proposed actionable steps to validate and address the findings. The outcome not only resolved the discrepancy but also strengthened trust and collaboration within the team. This experience reinforced the importance of balancing confidence in data with collaboration.
-
I ensure my data is accurate firstly. Then present to my manager in a simple, easy to understand format and showing how I came to the conclusion. If necessary I schedule in a meeting with my manager to discuss openly and listen to questions or concerns so I can understand if I need to make any further investigations, refine my analysis or adjust my approach to the analysis.
-
When data analysis contradicts expectations, I employ a balanced approach. I clarify data accuracy, organize presentation, and openly discuss findings with my manager. I seek common ground, propose actionable solutions and collaborate on implementing data-driven decisions, driving informed decision-making and stakeholder trust.
-
When my analysis contradicts my manager's expectations, I handle it through open communication and collaboration: - Present findings clearly with visuals and key insights. - Actively listen to understand their perspective. - Double-check data for accuracy and reliability. - Collaborate to refine the approach or identify gaps. - Propose actionable solutions aligned with goals. This ensures we resolve discrepancies constructively and effectively.
Rate this article
More relevant reading
-
Decision-MakingHow can you identify areas of your business that need improvement with data?
-
Business AnalysisYou're faced with conflicting data and client demands. How do you determine the right course of action?
-
Thought LeadershipHow do you balance opinions with data?
-
Executive SupportHow do you handle challenging questions or objections from your audience during your data presentation?