What are the key differences between scrum and kanban methodologies?

In my opinion and experience I’ve found it’s not a question of Scrum or Kanban but more often can we leverage both to enhance our work. The Kanban method is a pragmatic management method that’s great in managing knowledge work. The Scrum framework is an intentionally lightweight framework and often helped by leveraging general Kanban practices such as limiting WiP, explicit policies, and evolving the workflows. If you’re looking for differences, then quite simply Scrum is a framework and Kanban is a methodology.

My team works with Scrum, we work with 2-week sprints, it is very important to set goals and stay focused, but always be open to change, if priorities change, the scope can change as well, that is the beauty of Scrum, Flexibility, but remember, always take from your sprint an item with the same story points, so you don't compromise your team to deliver something undeliverable.

In my experience, Scrum offers a structured yet flexible approach to software development. With its iterative sprints and clearly defined roles and events, It provides a framework that fosters collaboration and empowers teams to deliver high-quality products efficiently. Kanban, on the other hand, champions continuous flow and adaptability. Its focus on visualizing work, limiting WIP, and fostering a culture of continuous improvement resonates deeply with me. Through implementing Kanban practices, teams can optimize their workflows, minimize bottlenecks, and enhance overall efficiency. In summary, both Scrum and Kanban offer unique approaches to software development, each with its strengths and benefits.

Primero que todo, la diferencia principal es que Scrum es un marco de trabajo y no una metodología. Entrega herramientas, roles, valores y tiempos definidos, pero no define la forma de realizar ma implementación y va a depender de cada producto y de cada equipo el "cómo" se desempeña dentro de él. Por su parte, Kanban en si es una metodología, que entrega herramientas y métodos de implementación, a la vez que indica ciertas pautas para poder desempeñarse dentro de dicha metodología.

Scrum, an agile project management approach, thrives on flexibility: 1. Roles: • Product Owner: Prioritizes features. • Scrum Master: Ensures adherence. • Development Team: Delivers iteratively. 2. Events: • Sprint: 2-4 weeks iteration. • Sprint Planning: Defines work. • Daily Scrum: Progress and planning. • Sprint Review: Showcase of work. 3. Artifacts: • Product Backlog: Prioritized features. • Sprint Backlog: Tasks for Sprint. • Increment: Potentially deliverable product. 4. Rules: • Incremental Development. • Transparency: All info available. • Inspection and Adaptation. Scrum fuels adaptive development for rapid delivery.

Change Management: Scrum discourages changes to the sprint backlog once a sprint has started, emphasizing stability and predictability within the sprint. Kanban allows for more flexibility and encourages continuous improvement, with changes to priorities and scope being made as needed.

Scrum offers a structured yet flexible approach to software development while Kanban is an effective agile methodology that offers transparency, flexibility, waste reduction, and continuous improvement.

The key is to assess the specific needs, constraints, and characteristics of the project, as well as the preferences and dynamics of the team. It's also common for organizations to use a combination of both methodologies, known as Scrumban, to leverage the strengths of both frameworks. Experimentation and adaptation based on continuous feedback and improvement are fundamental principles of agile methodologies.

I prefer Scrum for projects demanding structured planning and stability. In contrast, Kanban's adaptability and continuous flow suit dynamic environments with frequently shifting priorities. The decision hinges on the project's nature and the team's inclination towards a structured or flexible approach.

Kanban is an effective agile methodology that offers transparency, flexibility, waste reduction, and continuous improvement. It empowers teams to manage work efficiently, respond to customer needs, and adapt to changing priorities. It is particularly well-suited for situations where work is continuous and varied.

Roles and Ceremonies: Scrum: Has specific roles like Product Owner, Scrum Master, and Development Team. Regular ceremonies like Sprint Planning, Daily Scrum, Sprint Review, and Retrospective maintain rhythm and transparency. Kanban: No defined roles, teams self-organize. Meetings are optional and ad-hoc as needed. Emphasis is on visual workflow boards and continuous improvement.

Kanban is a method for managing workflow and visualizing work. It originated in manufacturing but has been widely adopted in software development and other industries. It involves visualizing work on a board, typically divided into columns representing different stages of the workflow, such as "To Do," "In Progress," and "Done." Tasks or work items are represented by cards that move across the board as they progress through the workflow. Kanban emphasizes limiting work in progress to improve flow and efficiency.

Kanban basiert auf dem Grundsatz des Lean Thinking „Wert über Fluss, Fluss über Beseitigung von Verschwendung“. Daraus ergeben sich Praktiken: - Limitiere die parallele Arbeit (das WIP) - Steuere den Arbeitsfluss - Mache Regeln explizit - Implementiere Feedbackschleifen Vorteile von Kanban liegen in der Einfachheit der Einführung. Im ersten Schritt wird die Realität abgebildet und nach und nach angepasst. Darüber hinaus gibt es geringe Wartezeiten auf bspw den nächsten Sprint. Eine Umpriorisierung im Backlog wirkt sich sofort auf die nächste begonnene Aufgabe aus. Overhead durch Regelmeetings kann eingespart werden.

Difference is Scrum is a lightweight frame work that suits complex work. Scrum operates on empiricism through inspect and adapt. The artifacts and events complements the same. Kanban is a method or tool that helps to improve visualization to set up work in progress limits to focus on finishing work. Kanban helps to identify and eliminate waste. It works well in a dynamic work environment where the workflow is not often changed.

Kanban's more like a to-do list on steroids, focusing on visualizing workflows and limiting work in progress. It's flexible, like yoga, adapting to changes without breaking a sweat, helping teams flow like a zen master in rush hour traffic.

It's not 'Phases' (Phasen) that a Kanban board visualizes, it's the 'knowledge-creating steps' (in knowledge work) or generally speaking the 'value-add steps'.

This visual representation of work progress helps teams to have a clear understanding of the status of each task and promotes collaboration among team members. By limiting work in progress, Kanban aims to enhance focus, reduce multitasking, and improve overall productivity. It encourages continuous improvement by fostering a culture of transparency, flexibility, and adaptability within the team. By regularly reviewing and refining the workflow, teams can streamline processes, deliver value more quickly, and ultimately achieve better outcomes. In essence, Kanban is not just a tool but a methodology that promotes continuous learning and evolution in software development practices.

Kanban is a workflow visualization system for software development that moves work items through stages, like backlog, analysis, development, testing, and deployment. There's a limit to the number of tasks in progress at any one time. The team pulls tasks from the backlog, progressing them based on priority and readiness. The workflow is continuously monitored to identify bottlenecks and the team implements changes to optimize efficiency and quality of outputs.

Scrum: Time-boxed iterations (sprints). Roles (e.g., Scrum Master, Product Owner). Prescriptive ceremonies (e.g., daily stand-ups, sprint planning). Emphasizes fixed scope, flexible time, and cost. Best for projects with well-defined goals and frequent customer feedback. Well-suited for teams new to agile. Kanban: Continuous flow of work, no fixed iterations. No specific roles or ceremonies (can be customized). Emphasizes limiting work in progress (WIP). Highly adaptable to varying priorities and work types. Best for continuous delivery and process improvement. Well-suited for teams with fluctuating workloads or mature agile experience.

Según mi experiencia, la diferencia en la planificación radica en la limitación de tiempo. En Scrum, esta limitación está definida por el sprint, mientras que Kanban se centra en la entrega de valor sin restricciones de tiempo fijo.

Both Scrum and Kanban are popular agile methodologies that offer unique benefits depending on the context and needs of the team. By understanding the nuances of each approach, teams can choose the right framework to enhance their productivity and deliver value to their customers efficiently.

Scrum and Kanban differ significantly in their approach to planning. Scrum involves structured planning with fixed-length sprints, usually 2-4 weeks, where the team commits to a specific set of tasks to complete within the sprint. Each sprint starts with a planning meeting to define the sprint backlog and ends with a review and retrospective. Kanban, on the other hand, focuses on continuous planning. There are no fixed-length iterations; tasks are continuously added to the Kanban board and worked on as capacity allows. Planning is more flexible, with tasks prioritized and pulled as needed, enabling ongoing adjustments without the constraints of set timeframes.

I totally disagree with this text comparing Scrum and Kanban in they of planning. Scrum: Yes you do iterations and you plan them. Fix is only the Sprint Goal and point in time when the Sprint ends. The scope the Developer work on can be added, removed and changed. This is extreme flexibel with the limit of not changing the Sprint Goal. Kanban: The Kanban System enforces a steady flow of things. So you cannot remove existing things or insert new things in the middle of the system. You can add new prioritized things in a 'ready' column when an existing thing was pulled to the next column. Or you can create a fast lane which shouldn't be too big because otherwise the rest of the system won't be a steady flow any more.

I object that Scrum provides more predictability. Predictability in Scrum depends on actually reaching the Sprint Goal (outcome) or managing to really have all work items planned for a Sprint being 'Done' at the end of it - i.e. the Plan turns out to be true. And said plan is based on estimations, assumptions and the like - that more often than not turn out to be wrong. Kanban provides predictability by tracking flow metrics and using this data as input for 'probabilistic forecasting' with just one, predefined, well-known assumption: The near future will be similar to the recent past. And that often provides more reliable results.

Prioritization and Work in Progress: Scrum: Backlog prioritization is essential, as only the highest priority items fit into each sprint. Work in progress (WIP) is limited within sprints to maintain focus. Kanban: Prioritization is ongoing, with tasks pulled into work columns based on available capacity and current priorities. WIP limits are set across the entire workflow to prevent bottlenecks.

In Scrum, planning occurs at the start of each sprint, with a fixed set of tasks for that period. In Kanban, planning is continuous, with tasks pulled from a backlog based on capacity and demand, allowing for more flexibility.

Scrum's the meticulous planner, setting sprint goals and sticking to them like glue. Kanban's more laid-back, letting teams adjust priorities on the fly, like a chef changing the recipe mid-cooking because someone wants extra spice.

Roles and Responsibilities: Scrum: Defines specific roles such as Scrum Master, Product Owner, and Development Team. Each role has distinct responsibilities. Kanban: Typically does not prescribe specific roles. It allows teams to define their own roles based on their needs.

In Scrum, there are defined roles like Product Owner, Scrum Master, and Development Team, each with specific responsibilities for the sprint. Kanban typically has fewer defined roles. There's usually no formal role like a Scrum Master, but there might be a person responsible for managing the Kanban board and ensuring the flow of work. The emphasis is more on the team collectively managing the workflow.

In Scrum, you've got the star players - Product Owner, Scrum Master, and Team - each with a specific role, like characters in a sitcom, playing their parts to keep the show running smoothly. Kanban's more like a jam session, where everyone's equal, chipping in wherever needed, like a jazz band improvising a killer tune.

Scrum has clearly defined roles like Scrum Master, Product Owner, and Scrum Team Members, each with specific responsibilities. Kanban does not prescribe specific roles; any team member can pull tasks based on priority and Work In Progress (WIP) limits. Kanban emphasizes collaboration and workflow performance over rigid roles.

Em uma experiência que tive em uma empresa, a falta de clareza nas funções de cada especialista gerou uma série de falhas na comunicação e atrasos. A definição clara de papéis em um projeto pode impactar diretamente nos resultados! Nesse caso foi necessário o Scrum, com seus papéis bem definidos, promoveu uma estrutura clara e colaboração entre os membros. Diferente do Kaban, com uma abordagem mais flexível, que permite que as equipes utilizem os papéis já existentes na empresa com mais autonomia.

Scrum and Kanban differ significantly. Scrum is a structured framework with set iterations, defined roles, and committed features, prioritizing planning and stability. Conversely, Kanban is a method that emphasizes continuous workflow, dynamic prioritization, and adaptability. It lacks fixed iterations, offers flexible roles, and pulls work based on capacity and priority, promoting a more adaptable and continuous approach.

Continuous Improvement: Scrum: Encourages inspecting and adapting during the sprint retrospective, where the team reflects on what went well and what could be improved. Kanban: Emphasizes continuous improvement as an ongoing process. Teams are encouraged to make incremental changes to their processes.

In Scrum, continuous improvement is facilitated through regular sprint retrospectives, where the team reflects on what went well, what could be improved, and identifies actions for the next sprint. Kanban promotes continuous improvement through a focus on evolutionary change. Teams regularly review their workflow and make adjustments to improve efficiency and effectiveness. There's no fixed cadence like sprint retrospectives, but improvements are made as needed to enhance the flow of work.

Scrum's all about inspecting and adapting after each sprint, like a detective solving a case, constantly fine-tuning the process. Kanban's more like a continuous improvement buffet, with teams tweaking workflows whenever they spot room for enhancement, like a DIY enthusiast adding shelves wherever there's empty space.

Dass Scrum mehr Wert auf Lernen und Experimentieren legt ist falsch. Scrum hat festgelegte Zeremonien, in denen Inspect and Adapt implementiert sind. Kanban hingegen erwartet von Teammitgliedern zu jedem Zeitpunkt im Prozess eine kontinuierliche Verbesserung, und bezeichnet das als Führung auf allen Ebenen. Auch ist es unzureichend, Verbesserungen bei Scrum nur in der Retrospektive zu erwarten. Im Review sind Verbesserungen des Produkts und Stakeholderfeedback gegeben, und im Planning ist Feedback vom Team gewünscht. Zudem beobachte ich oft, dass Scrum durch die Form der Retrospektiven einen Verbesserungsfokus im Team legt, während Kanban den Gesamtprozess und das Gesamtsystem optimiert. So hat Kanban einen Vorteil für das Gesamtprodukt.

Did the KI really fail to get that Kanban Cadences exist? Some of them concerned with reflecting one the past and deriving possible improvements from that? Which is exactly what a Scrum Retrospective also aims for?

Scrum incorporates improvement via sprint retrospectives, a regular pause to reflect and adapt for the next sprint. Kanban seeks continuous improvement, with ongoing monitoring of key metrics to inform data-driven optimizations. Scrum encourages structured, scheduled learning, while Kanban focuses on constant, incremental process enhancements.

Scrum ist besser geeignet, wenn ein Team auf der grünen Wiese anfängt, da so ein Grundset von Prozess vorgegeben ist, das einen Standard hat und bekannt ist. Bei laufenden Projekten, insbesondere wenn sie nicht agil sind, ist Kanban die bessere Wahl, um den Übergang und die Verbesserungen leichter zu gestalten. Ein Wechsel von Scrum zu Kanban bietet sich an, wenn das Team einen hohen Reifegrad erreicht hat und die Meetings zu starr sind. Auch wenn die Rahmenbedingungen eine höhere Flexibilität erfordern, kann ein Wechsel von Scrum zu Kanban sinnvoll sein. Ein Wechsel von Kanban zu Scrum ist meist nur dann sinnvoll, wenn eine Synchronisation in der Zusammenarbeit von verschiedenen Teams nötig ist, und bspw. Kundenteams mit Scrum arbeiten.

Stop promoting Hybrids. It takes vast amounts of experience to create a coherent whole out of individual parts and what some call Scrumban was never intended as a method or framework but as a transitionary status from Scrum to Kanban.

Según mi experiencia, la elección entre los marcos de trabajo Scrum y Kanban suele depender principalmente de la complejidad del proyecto y la madurez del equipo.

The choice between Scrum and Kanban depends on your team's specific needs and preferences. If you value structured, time-boxed iterations and defined roles, Scrum might be the better choice. On the other hand, if you prefer a more flexible approach with continuous improvement and a focus on flow, Kanban could be the way to go. It's essential to consider factors like team size, project complexity, and organizational culture when making the decision. Ultimately, both methodologies can be effective when implemented correctly.

Choosing between Scrum and Kanban's like picking a pet - it depends on your lifestyle and preferences. Want structure and predictability? Go for Scrum. Prefer flexibility and adaptability? Kanban's your buddy.

Choosing between Scrum and Kanban involves considering factors such as project complexity, team size, maturity, client expectations, organizational culture, and goals. Scrum is typically favored if you require more structure, discipline, and alignment with fixed timeboxes and scope. Kanban suits better if you need increased flexibility, adaptability, and autonomy with variable demand and feedback. Combining elements from both methods can also be beneficial in creating a hybrid approach that best meets your needs.

To me, the whole article is flawed. Comparing Scrum to Kanban is moot, because they work on different levels. Scrum is a process framework (tho they stopped saying so), Kanban is a (change) management method. You implement Scrum in an environment by adding the things that are missing for you. The result of implementing Scrum is always Scrum (if you do it right). Kanban is not implemented. Instead it is applied to an existing process in order to continually improve it. The result is not Kanban. Kanban is just the tool to help you get to the process that is most fit for your purpose. Thus, you can use Kanban to improve your implementation of Scrum. Scrum vs Kanban. Comparison moot. Like the question "Nail vs. Hammer". Point made. Case closed.

Many, if not most, organisations begin their agile transition with Scrum, because the framework gives assurance of a structured way of work in the shape of Sprint However, most of them drift into what can be called Time boxed Kanban, because they no longer bother to have 'Sprint Goal' A good Scrum Master would steer the team towards Scrumban and eventually to Kanban if that suits best for the project's new reality

Remember, it's not just about the methodology; it's about your team's culture, project requirements, and organizational goals. So, don't forget to sprinkle some common sense on top of your decision-making process, like seasoning a dish to perfection.