Conflicting feedback is actually helpful because it brings in diverse perspectives. The best way to handle this is to first let the people who received the feedback figure out which parts align with the project goals and make the most sense to move forward with. They should prioritise the suggestions that have the biggest impact and are realistic to implement. Once that’s done, they can present their reasoning to the stakeholders if needed. This keeps things focused and avoids having to bring everyone together repeatedly.

I start by dissecting feedback to pinpoint overlaps or contradictions, then weigh each against the project's core goals and technical feasibility. I often set up one-on-one calls first to understand the reasoning behind their feedback, sometimes the conflict stems from misaligned expectations. Then, I facilitate a joint session to present my analysis, ensuring the discussion is data-driven and focused on impact rather than opinions. For recurring conflicts, I propose a decision-making framework: prioritize feedback based on the end user's needs or align it with measurable business outcomes. Documenting the final decision and rationale is crucial to maintaining clarity and momentum.

To handle conflicting feedback from stakeholders ; Align feedback with project goals and priorities. Collect, organize, and clarify feedback to find common ground. Prioritize input from key decision-makers. Propose solutions with clear trade-offs. Facilitate discussions to resolve conflicts. Document and communicate decisions transparently. Stay professional and adaptable. Focus on alignment and communication to manage conflicts effectively.

To handling this problem, First of all, aligns feedback with project goals and priorities. Secondly, I gather stockholders together to discuss about the problem and find the best solution based on first step. Then, document feedbacks for the future. Finally, focus on functional requirements and details more than the past and make sure codes are so readable and have more specific comments.

When dealing with conflicting feedback, first I ensure that I understand each stakeholder's perspective. Then revisit the project's main goals to keep everyone aligned. Asking for specific examples helps clarify feedback. If needed, I might bring the stakeholders together for a discussion to find common ground. I look for compromises, prioritize what's essential, and document decisions to ensure consistency. Finally, I remain open to ongoing feedback, making adjustments as the project progresses. This approach helps resolve conflicts and improves the final outcome.

To tackle this,we should find common ground, get a group feedback and keep the track of record of decisions to avoid confusion later.

The most important aspect of the last moment conflict is freeze requirements. Clear guidelines and lack of documentation of functional requirements. Stackholders should frequently align with teams for deviation from requirements and timelines. feedback is a vital aspect of project success and this should be done in such a way that it helps the team to finish the task on time with best practices rather then creating negatively and effecting team productivity. four eye principle should be adopted for reviewing deliverables aligned with agreed requirements.

I would seek assistance from my team lead or inform them of my key strengths. If even this will not work I will wait for them to make conclusion.

1. With detailed documentation on the project scope, functional requirements and budget constraints, demonstrate why a functionality is implemented that way or why a specific design is chosen over the others. 2. It is crucial to organize bi-weekly or monthly meetings for feedback, to avoid multiple last minute requests for changes in functional or performance requirements. This also saves having to undo a lot of already implemented code, if a major functional or user interface change is requested. 3. Document everything discussed and agreed upon.