Trust must be earned - evasive is totally contrary to trust. It's big red flag and evaluate alternative if feasible In case you have no other vendor, then situation gets tricky. - If it’s critical service, it should be a no go - If it customer facing service, than you cant depend on vendor for SLA - If it is not critical and there are other good reasons for not switching to different vendor, then you have to draft air tight contract, keep spare parts/stock in house, train in house resources for support, buy insurance and keep searching alternative vedor

I basically go with some of the points below: We need to basically evaluate the vendor security policies. Check out the transparency of policies and compliance regulations. Also, we need to examine the device secuirty features such as secure boot, encryption, access control etc. Its important that vendor should support us with security updates regularly. Ayditing the vendor supply management would be expensive but I think it would help a lot in security management.

Evasive vendors selling IoT products are a red flag. Their reluctance to be transparent about security measures raises serious concerns. Trust is earned, not assumed. Here's why you should be cautious: Lack of Transparency: A vendor's unwillingness to disclose security details suggests they may be hiding vulnerabilities. Potential Backdoors: Evasive behavior could indicate the presence of backdoors or hidden access points for malicious actors. Unreliable Products: Products with unclear security practices are more likely to be compromised, exposing your data and systems to risk. Don't settle for vague promises. Demand concrete security information and independent audits before trusting an evasive vendor with your IoT needs.

It's hard to trust an evasive vendor, especially with IoT products where security is critical. If they avoid answering questions about their security measures, it's a red flag. Reliable vendors should be transparent about things like encryption, regular updates, and vulnerability management. If they can’t provide clear answers, i’ll assume they might be cutting corners. Poor IoT security can lead to breaches, data theft, or company devices being hijacked. I’ll Push for detailed responses or I might consider alternative vendors who take security seriously. It’s better to be cautious now than deal with a costly security incident later.

Do ponto de vista de Segurança, um fornecedor Evasivo, não seria um Fornecedor da organização. Seria impedido pela Segurança. Empresas sérias possuem este rigor. Mas se a situação por falha acontecer, entendo que temos que demonstrar que a organização exige uma mudança de postura deste Fornecedor. Somente assim poderíamos dar sequencia à parceria.

Security goes hand in hand with a trust relationship with support vendors. I don't think any organization will opt to have support contract if there is trust and commitment.

Conduct a thorough evaluation of their product, focusing on areas like secure communication, firmware updates, and vulnerability management. Use third-party penetration testing if necessary. Ask for evidence of adherence to relevant industry standards or certifications, such as ISO 27001, NIST guidelines, or IoT-specific frameworks like ETSI EN 303 645. Determine if the vendor provides ongoing support, regular security updates, and a clear incident response process. Lack of commitment to these areas is a red flag. Identify potential risks associated with using their product and weigh them against the benefits. If risks outweigh the trustworthiness of the vendor, consider alternatives.

Trusting an evasive IoT vendor necessitates heightened scrutiny. Demand detailed documentation on their security architecture, including encryption algorithms, authentication mechanisms, and adherence to frameworks like ISO 27001 or NIST CSF. Insist on independent third-party penetration testing and vulnerability assessments. Vendors that obfuscate such critical information signal potential risks to your infrastructure’s integrity. Prioritize partnerships with demonstrable security rigor and verifiable compliance credentials to safeguard your ecosystem.

When evaluating an evasive IoT vendor, I’ve found that transparency is a cornerstone of trust. Vendors who resist providing security documentation often signal deeper issues. Beyond asking for certifications like ISO/IEC 27001 or CSA STAR, push for evidence of secure software development practices and regular penetration testing. A strong vendor will welcome scrutiny, such as red team assessments or independent code reviews. Contractually, hold the vendor accountable with clauses on incident response times and data breach liability. But the key? Maintain leverage by ensuring alternative vendors are always in consideration. Trust should be earned, not assumed.

To ensure the security measures of an evasive IoT vendor are trustworthy, take the following steps: 1.Request detailed security documentation: Ask for compliance certifications (e.g., ISO 27001, GDPR) to assess the vendor's adherence to industry standards. 2.Conduct third-party security assessments: Verify the vendor’s security claims independently to ensure their systems are robust. 3.Establish clear contractual agreements: Include security guarantees, performance benchmarks, and penalties for breaches in the contract. 4.Implement regular security reviews: Continuously monitor and test the vendor’s systems for emerging threats and vulnerabilities.