You're facing conflicting project approaches from team members. How do you choose the right path forward?
When team members propose conflicting approaches, it's crucial to evaluate each option carefully to ensure the project's success. Here's how to determine the best path:
How do you handle conflicting project approaches? Share your strategies.
You're facing conflicting project approaches from team members. How do you choose the right path forward?
When team members propose conflicting approaches, it's crucial to evaluate each option carefully to ensure the project's success. Here's how to determine the best path:
How do you handle conflicting project approaches? Share your strategies.
-
Conflict management techniques in project management: Keep in mind that conflict happens. Don't avoid or ignore conflicts. Actively listen to different views. Facilitate and encourage discussion. Keep conversations neutral. Think about the resolution.
-
In most instances the key reasons for such conflicting approaches can be lack of a common project delivery framework within the organization, or lack of knowledge of such frameworks or lack of data driven decision making. While takings views on board reemphasize the project objectives and goals to the team members so that they can ground their recommendations in context. Ask for Data for everything - when asked to back their recommendations with data they will be more circumspect. Lastly while deciding the approach, look at what your own organization's frameworks and methodologies recommend in such situations.
-
Facilitate an open discussion to understand each team member’s perspective and rationale. Evaluate each approach against the project’s goals, timelines, and resources to ensure alignment. Use data and expert input to assess the feasibility, risks, and benefits of each option. Encourage collaboration to explore a hybrid solution that combines the strengths of both approaches. If consensus isn’t possible, make an informed decision as a leader, balancing team input with project needs. Clearly communicate the decision and reasoning to ensure transparency and maintain team cohesion, emphasizing shared goals to foster alignment and commitment.
-
When facing conflicting project approaches, start by clarifying the project’s goals to ensure all proposals align with its objectives. Objectively evaluate the feasibility, risks, and resource requirements of each option, weighing their pros and cons. Engage the team to gather diverse insights, fostering collaboration and ownership of the final decision. If possible, rely on data, past experiences, or industry benchmarks to guide the choice. In cases of uncertainty, consider running small-scale pilot tests to evaluate outcomes before committing. Finally, work towards a unified decision by integrating the best aspects of each approach or finding a practical compromise. Focus on open communication and the project’s success.
-
Usually team members offer solutions. There is a problem happening that makes them think of the solution. But often times, they don't or can't clearly identify the problem. What I would suggest is asking the team to work together to define the problem or opportunity they see....in my experience, the solutions that follow are often different than the competing ones that were first noticed. Define the problem or opportunity first.
-
In order to make way through conflicting approaches for solution, we need to go till last end of the problem, involve experts of the area along with users to understand the problem. Then evaluate which approach could be better in terms of: Accuracy Process time Complexity User friendliness Scalability Rank each in the same chronology, weigh high to low in same chronology. Then decide approach if A or B or A+B is better.
-
The key to making complex project timelines comprehensible for non-technical clients is to: focus on business outcomes rather than technical details, use simple visualizations, group tasks into clear phases, and highlight major milestones. The presentation should tell a story about how the project delivers value, not just list technical tasks.
-
One thing I have found helpful at Kebabs Faktory is our “360° Solution Framework.” We evaluate each proposal through three lenses: feasibility, resources, and guest experience impact. This removes personal bias and focuses on objective metrics. Actually, I disagree with quick-fix solutions. My experience at Shabestan taught me that blending approaches often yields better results than choosing just one path. We use a “Test & Learn” method, running small trials before full implementation. An example I have seen: When our team clashed over a new menu launch strategy, we: ✓ Created scoring matrices ✓ Tested both approaches ✓ Combined winning elements Result? A hybrid solution that outperformed both original proposals!
-
Sometimes you don't need to take a decision right away. You can begin with a plan that initially appears more suitable to the task and then take key elements from both plans depending on how things unfold. I've rarely seen a plan being implemented exactly till the very end.
Rate this article
More relevant reading
-
Leadership DevelopmentYour team is divided on project strategies. How will you navigate conflicting opinions to lead effectively?
-
Team FacilitationYour team is divided on project direction. How do you ensure quality outcomes amidst conflicting opinions?
-
Cross Functional Team BuildingWhat are some of the tools and frameworks that you use to align a cross-functional team around a common goal?
-
People ManagementYour team is divided on project direction. How do you navigate conflicting views among members?