You're evaluating geological data from non-technical sources. How can you ensure its reliability?

start by cross-checking the data with reputable geological databases and peer-reviewed journals. Compare the information with existing geological maps and reports for consistency. Consult experienced geologists to validate the data and conduct site visits to corroborate it with on-ground observations. Utilize geostatistical methods and software for accurate analysis, and ensure all data sources are well-documented and traceable. This comprehensive approach helps maintain the integrity and reliability of the geological data.

You do have repudiable sources available to vet the base assumption within the source. These include your experience and the basic premise that processes that happened in the past are the same processes acting today. Look for analogues to validate the underlying premises in the source but keep a critical eye on the conclusions.

This process entails evaluating the reliability of the source by examining its authority and trustworthiness. Information from reputable entities, including government geological surveys, academic institutions, or recognized industry leaders, is generally more dependable. It is essential to prioritize experts with solid qualifications in geology, such as geologists or researchers, over unverified or informal contributors. Additionally, cross-referencing the information with other credible sources enhances its accuracy, thereby minimizing the risk of errors or misinformation.

Here are the steps to follow: Accuracy: Check if the information aligns with known geological facts and principles. Inaccuracies or overly simplistic explanations may indicate unreliability. Detail: Reliable sources often provide in-depth analysis. Vague or surface-level descriptions may signal a lack of scientific rigor. Consistency: Compare the content with data from trusted sources, such as government agencies or academic publications. Consistency with well-established information increases reliability. Evidence: Look for supporting data, charts, or references to studies. The absence of evidence may suggest the content is less trustworthy

It depends on the stage of the exploration exercise . Are you at target definition , or reconnaissance sampling or resource delineation? I will advice you take some random samples of the data sets and do some “ground truthing”. If the returns are positive then you have a starting point . We are exploring for iron in a province where the locals knew of a village that had ancient blacksmiths who we were told were digging shallow pits to get iron . We visited this place and took coordinates . These pits were aligned with some geophysical anomalies from an aeromag that was flown by the company . In Mali we used termite mounds to identify structural lineaments in duricrusts . D cathedral mounds higher than 2m perfectly aligned with faults.