Platform to the team must be provided to put across different ideas and strategies which gives more clarity to the manager/leader about the knowledge base and the approach of an individual. Once the most effective strategies are defined then further deep dive sessions to be made then only conflicts will get clear. Most important thing for manager is to provide conducive environment for the team where they feel that their words are heard and collectively decisions are made.

First, it's essential to establish a common goal: optimizing automation outcomes while minimizing disruptions to existing processes. I approach the debate by encouraging open communication, where each team member is given the opportunity to present their perspective on automation strategies, including the potential benefits and limitations of their proposed approach. To facilitate this, I set ground rules, such as respectful dialogue and data-driven arguments, to maintain a productive atmosphere. Next, I apply systems thinking to dissect each proposal, considering the technical specifications, possible integration challenges, and potential impact on our workflows.

Seek detailed feedback : Ask the client for specific reasons behind the rejection to understand their expectations better. Present alternatives : Offer multiple design options to give the client choices and demonstrate flexibility.

Go with the best most efficient idea for the project pretty simple really, people who feel rejected by this should leave the company anyway