If my team is divided on tech tools for mapping it will be glade for me to know that they have enough experience and knowledge of tools and technology. I will invite all them to open discussion and vote for the following points. 1. Coast effective 2. Easy to access and consultation 3. Mobility to the site 4. Quality and authentication of results 5. Ease to analyse the results The tool which gain maximum points we will go with that.

In my experience, unifying a team divided on tech tools for geological mapping requires a structured and inclusive approach that prioritizes collaboration and clear evaluation criteria like facilitating open discussions, defining clear evaluation criteria, pilot testing, gathering feedback and facilitating consensus-building

To resolve disagreements about tech tools for geological mapping, it is always good to start by encouraging open discussion where everyone can share their thoughts and concerns. Also do some tests on a few of the top choices in real-world scenarios to determine their practicality and effectiveness. Focus on tools that promote teamwork and integrate seamlessly with your current systems. Bringing in expert opinions or using structural evaluation methods, like scoring tools against key criteria, can further guide the decision. Clear communication about the final choice, along with proper training, ensures the team aligns and uses the tool effectively enough.

Designing and Structuring a clear approach, and putting the guidelines after reconnaissance survey, surely; will facilitate the geological mapping and will unifies the team's decision, then setting discussions before and after first visits and mapping traverses, for defining the best techs and its impact for the work intensity and accuracy.

Everything that refers to new technology is synonymous with change and also resistance to change. The most experienced team members will be the first to object, and it will cause enthusiasm in the new ones. Dealing with this is an art and the first thing you have to do is listen to opinions and pay attention to what is said. and look for the way in which the ideas converge and make it be taken as a new challenge that will make the team more solid.

Pour parvenir à une décision unifiée, il est crucial d'adopter une approche collaborative. Organisez une réunion où chaque membre pourra présenter les avantages et les limites des outils qu'il préconise. Utiliser des critères objectifs comme la précision, la facilité d'utilisation , le coût et l'intégration avec les outils existants pour évaluer les options.

I may not answer the question but as long as mapping is the only concern, and no need for online data connexions, I would let people use the software they're most used to, as long they remains efficient and each output is shareable and merging made easy. Field mapping apps now comes in different flavors, often free or cheap to buy and have export features for easy sharing and merging. Trying to convince people to use an imposed tool instead of the one they are comfortable with looks counter-productive to me. Time for team discussions will be better spent on the geological observations agreement : what is what ? Is this an altered basalt or and andesite ? Is this fabric an S1 or an S2 ? And so on, to get the most homogeneous map possible.

To unify the team's decision, I would propose defining project objectives and requirements, then identifying key mapping tasks and workflows. We'd evaluate and compare available tech tools, conduct a cost-benefit analysis, and consider user experience. Next, we'd hold a team meeting to discuss findings and concerns, collaborate to create a shortlist of suitable tools, and conduct a trial project to test them. Finally, we'd review the results and make a unified decision based on the team's collective feedback and experience.

When choosing tech tools for geological mapping, I prioritize collaboration and informed decisions. I facilitate open discussions to gather diverse perspectives, pilot multiple tools to assess real-world effectiveness, and prioritize those that enhance teamwork and integrate seamlessly with existing systems. This ensures balanced, inclusive, and practical decisions that align with both immediate needs and long-term goals.