Your ML model results don't match business predictions. How do you manage expectations?
When machine learning (ML) model results differ from business predictions, it’s crucial to manage expectations and align insights. Here’s how to navigate this challenge:
How do you handle discrepancies between ML results and business predictions?
Your ML model results don't match business predictions. How do you manage expectations?
When machine learning (ML) model results differ from business predictions, it’s crucial to manage expectations and align insights. Here’s how to navigate this challenge:
How do you handle discrepancies between ML results and business predictions?
-
When ML results don’t align with business predictions, I see it as an opportunity to bridge understanding. From my experience, the first step is transparency—clearly outlining the model’s constraints and what it was designed to achieve. Collaboration is key; I work closely with business teams to identify gaps, whether in the data, assumptions, or goals. Finally, I iterate and refine the model based on feedback, ensuring it evolves to better meet expectations. For me, it’s not just about managing the discrepancy—it’s about turning it into a stepping stone for smarter strategies and stronger alignment.
-
When ML results differ from business predictions, start by aligning on goals and assumptions. Review the model’s methodology, data, and metrics with stakeholders, explaining its logic and limitations. Compare predictions with historical trends to validate accuracy or uncover gaps in assumptions. Highlight how the model adds value by providing data-driven insights, even when results differ. Propose refining the model or revisiting business expectations collaboratively. Use clear communication, visual aids, and non-technical language to build understanding and trust. Emphasize the iterative nature of machine learning, framing differences as opportunities for improvement rather than failures, to manage expectations effectively.
-
Be Transparent: Explain why the results differ, focusing on data quality, assumptions, or model limitations. Show the Value: Highlight the actionable insights the model provides, even if they weren’t expected. Revisit Assumptions: Work with stakeholders to align on realistic goals and refine predictions. Propose Adjustments: Suggest improving the model with better data or feature engineering. Communicate Next Steps: Share a clear plan to address gaps and deliver more aligned results.
-
When ML model results diverge from business predictions, effective management requires transparent communication, collaborative problem-solving, and continuous refinement. Engage business teams to understand model limitations, conduct joint analysis, and iteratively improve model performance. Set realistic expectations, investigate prediction mismatches, and maintain an ongoing dialogue to align model insights with business goals.
-
When ML results don't align with business expectations. By combining these below approaches, I can bridge the gap and make informed decisions. - Collaborate: I Work with the business team to understand their perspective. - Validate: I Ensure model accuracy and reliability. - Communicate: I clearly explain limitations and uncertainties. - Iterate: I continuously improve the model.
-
When ML results differ from business predictions, I focus on transparency, collaboration, and improvement. I communicate the model's limitations clearly, ensuring stakeholders understand its scope. By working closely with business teams, I align insights and explore discrepancies as opportunities for strategic refinement. Through iterative improvements and data-driven storytelling, I translate technical outputs into actionable insights, building trust and ensuring alignment with business goals.
-
To manage expectations when ML results diverge from business predictions, communicate transparently about model limitations and assumptions. Align on metrics that reflect business goals. Conduct a gap analysis to identify discrepancies and adjust the model or business assumptions as needed. Foster collaboration between data scientists and business stakeholders to ensure mutual understanding. Provide regular updates and involve stakeholders in the model refinement process to ensure alignment.
-
Based on my experience, managing gaps between ML results and business predictions often requires uncommon strategies. Here are a few I’ve found effective: 1️⃣ 𝐂𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐚𝐥 𝐈𝐧𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐀𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐲𝐬𝐢𝐬: Go beyond correlation to identify cause-effect relationships, helping stakeholders understand unexpected outcomes better. 2️⃣ 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐂𝐨-𝐂𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧: Involve stakeholders in model-building workshops to align their expectations with technical realities early on. 3️⃣ 𝐌𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐥 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐲 𝐓𝐨𝐨𝐥𝐬: Use frameworks like SHAP or LIME to explain predictions clearly, building trust even when results deviate from predictions.
-
📊 Clarify Model Assumptions: Start by transparently explaining the model's assumptions, data limitations, and probabilistic nature to stakeholders. This helps set realistic expectations early on. 🤝 Foster Collaboration: Bridge the gap by engaging business teams in the process. Collaboratively analyze discrepancies to uncover if adjustments are needed in the model, data, or business strategy. 🔄 Refine Through Feedback: Treat misalignment as an opportunity to improve. Incorporate feedback loops and retrain models to better align with evolving business needs. By maintaining open communication and focusing on iterative improvement, you can align ML outcomes with impactful business goals.
-
When ML model results diverge from business predictions, I first align with stakeholders to ensure the problem framing matches business goals. Next, I validate the dataset to identify biases, inconsistencies, or insufficient features that may affect accuracy. I then analyze the model’s performance metrics (e.g., precision, recall, MAE) to assess its validity. If needed, I tune hyperparameters, explore feature engineering, or consider alternative algorithms. To manage expectations, I explain the probabilistic nature of ML models and highlight how factors like data quality, domain complexity, or changes in business dynamics impact outcomes.
Rate this article
More relevant reading
-
Machine LearningHow can you use accuracy as an evaluation metric?
-
Machine LearningWhat do you do if your machine learning initiatives are draining your resources?
-
Machine LearningWhat do you do if stakeholders don't understand the value of Machine Learning?
-
Machine LearningWhat do you do if your boss is unaware of the potential of machine learning in your industry?