Your client wants design changes that harm user experience. How will you navigate this challenge?
When a client requests design changes that could harm user experience (UX), it's essential to communicate effectively and provide evidence-based solutions. Here's how you can approach this challenge:
How would you handle client demands that might harm UX? Share your strategies.
Your client wants design changes that harm user experience. How will you navigate this challenge?
When a client requests design changes that could harm user experience (UX), it's essential to communicate effectively and provide evidence-based solutions. Here's how you can approach this challenge:
How would you handle client demands that might harm UX? Share your strategies.
-
If a client requests design changes that could affect user experience, I would share data or examples showing how these changes might impact usability. I’d also suggest alternative designs that achieve the client's goals while maintaining a smooth user experience. This way, we can work together towards a solution that benefits both the user and the client.
-
To handle client requests that harm UX: ★ Use data: Present analytics or user testing to show potential negative impacts. ★ Offer alternatives: Suggest design changes that still meet client goals but preserve UX. ★ Highlight long-term benefits: Explain how good UX boosts user retention and satisfaction.
-
- Listen client goals and explain the potential risks data and user feedback. Offer alternative solutions that balance the client's objective with positive user experience, and suggest testing to measure the impact. Educate them on the value of UX for business outcomes, and collaborate to find a solution that aligns with both user needs and client goals.
-
When a client requests design changes that may harm user experience, I address it by first explaining the impact of these changes on usability, citing examples or data to illustrate potential issues. I propose alternative solutions that incorporate their ideas while preserving user experience, demonstrating my commitment to their vision and the end-user's needs. This collaborative approach helps build trust and keeps the project aligned with both user-centered design principles and the client’s objectives.
-
When a client requests design changes that could harm user experience (UX), it’s crucial to handle the situation with diplomacy and data. Start by educating the client with user testing results or analytics that demonstrate potential negative impacts, and offer alternative solutions that meet their goals without compromising usability. Communicating the long-term benefits of good UX—such as increased user retention, reduced support costs, and better brand perception—can help them see the bigger picture. Ultimately, maintaining open, respectful communication ensures that both the client’s objectives and users’ needs are prioritized.
-
When a client requests design changes that could harm user experience, it’s essential to educate them on the potential impact. Present data or examples showing how the changes might affect usability and performance. Offer alternative solutions that align with their goals while maintaining a strong user experience. By balancing the client’s desires with UX best practices, you can guide them toward a solution that meets their needs without compromising usability.
-
Moreover, involving the client in a collaborative design process by conducting user feedback sessions can help them see firsthand how certain changes affect the user experience, making them more likely to align with evidence-based decisions.
-
If a client requests design changes that could harm user experience, I would first seek to understand their mindset and expectations. Using my expertise, I would create a design that aligns with their goals while maintaining optimal UX. Once the design is ready, I would present it to the client and explain how their suggested changes might negatively impact UX. I would highlight both the positive and negative aspects of their proposed design and demonstrate how my approach addresses the negative points while retaining the positives. This way, I can effectively communicate the value of my solution and ensure the client's objectives are met without compromising user experience.
-
There's no "right" way to deal with this situation in my opinion. It heavily depends on the groundwork you have done before starting the project. It's important to understand the root of this problem. Clients in a good chunk of cases might believe that just because they own the website, they know exactly how the site should. You as a professional should establish from the get-go that beautiful art and functional design are two different things. Establishing that you are the expert in this situation might help you earn more freedom. This is easier said than done and is a thin line to walk, but if done right this will help mitigate a few of these situations. But as I said, this is not a golden word. You have to take it one client at a time.
-
1. Motivations behind this - Does it impacts costs, improve aesthetics, or any specific goal? 2. Explain the concept of user-centred design - Use principles from usability testing, research, and industry best. 3. Present Data-Backed Reasoning - Analytics data that indicates where users are struggling with the proposed design. 4. Provide Alternatives- Propose design solutions that balance both the client’s desires and the user experience. 5. Compromise When Necessary & Keep the Dialogue Open: - Try to find a mid-way where you can address their concerns while still maintaining a solid user experience keep an open line of communication.