A key stakeholder pushes for a low-priority project. Can you navigate the clash with high-impact initiatives?
When a key stakeholder pushes for a low-priority project, it's essential to balance their needs with ongoing high-impact initiatives. Here’s how you can navigate this challenge:
How do you handle competing priorities? Share your insights.
A key stakeholder pushes for a low-priority project. Can you navigate the clash with high-impact initiatives?
When a key stakeholder pushes for a low-priority project, it's essential to balance their needs with ongoing high-impact initiatives. Here’s how you can navigate this challenge:
How do you handle competing priorities? Share your insights.
-
Changing priority (in this case) to Low priority has a reason. 1. The starting point is (accept it as going to be changed anyway) review the project's current state, even into details. 2. The next step is to analyse and start changing it to adopt requirements to the Low level. 3. Communication at the start is needed to review status and requirements and, after changes, evaluate and promote changes that allow a project to run, even at a low price.
-
Understand Their Perspective: Often, their priorities stem from business needs that might not yet be visible to the broader team. Reinforce Business Goals: Highlight how current high-impact initiatives align with organizational objectives. Collaborate, Not Confront: Instead of outright rejecting their proposal, explore ways to incorporate their project into the roadmap. This could mean deferring it to a later sprint or assigning a lightweight team to assess feasibility. Transparent Communication: When everyone has visibility into the bigger picture, it’s easier to gain consensus. Document and Revisit: Ensure the low-priority project is documented, and commit to revisiting it at an appropriate time.
-
Balancing priorities is never easy, especially when politics come into play. The key lies in clear communication: acknowledging perspectives, providing context on strategic priorities, and finding balance through collaboration and transparency. That said, a well-managed project portfolio always leaves room for the occasional detour into the irrational—because even chaos has a role in shaping great strategies!
-
In my experience, navigating a stakeholder's push for a low-priority project alongside high-impact initiatives involves clear communication and strategic negotiation. Present the importance and ROI of current high-impact projects and how they align with company goals. Analyze the low-priority project’s benefits and costs to show its lower relevance. Offer to revisit the project once critical initiatives are on track or propose smaller, quick wins that address the stakeholder's concerns without diverting significant resources. This respects their input while maintaining focus on high-impact goals.
-
Balancing competing priorities when a key stakeholder champions a low-priority project requires diplomacy and strategic communication. Start by understanding their perspective through a focused discussion to uncover the project's importance to them. Use transparent communication to outline your team's current workload and the potential trade-offs of diverting resources. Finally, propose alternatives, such as a phased implementation or integrating aspects of their project into existing initiatives, to show you're responsive while maintaining focus on high-impact goals.
-
Understand Their Perspective I schedule a meeting to learn why the project matters to them. This helps uncover underlying business drivers that might shift its priority. Communicate Transparently I explain the current workload and potential trade-offs, ensuring they understand how prioritizing one task affects others. Propose Alternatives I suggest a phased approach or adjusted timeline to balance the stakeholder’s request with high-impact initiatives, keeping progress on track.
-
Navigating competing priorities can be tricky, especially when key stakeholders push for low-priority projects. I’ve found that clarity and open communication are crucial in these situations. I usually start by understanding the stakeholder’s perspective and showing empathy for their concerns. Then, I communicate transparently about how the current workload impacts higher-priority tasks. Offering phased solutions or alternative timelines often helps in balancing both short-term and long-term goals without derailing the broader strategy.
-
Balancing stakeholder demands with ongoing high-impact initiatives requires tact and strategy. Start by understanding their perspective—schedule a conversation to uncover why the project is significant to them. Communicate transparently about existing workloads and the risks of diverting resources from critical initiatives. Finally, propose alternatives, such as a phased rollout or adjusted timelines, to address their needs without compromising key objectives. Collaborative problem-solving fosters trust and ensures alignment.
Rate this article
More relevant reading
-
Research and Development (R&D)How can you handle a situation where stakeholders have opposing views on the timeline for an R&D project?
-
Project ControlHow do you balance the needs and interests of different stakeholders represented by the steering committee?
-
Project ManagementHow do you tell your stakeholders when things go wrong?
-
Call Center AdministrationWhat do you do if your project team and stakeholders are not on the same page?