Learn how to check the reliability of food science associations and networks. Follow these tips to find quality and credible resources for your field.

I am no food science professional, in fact no science professional of any type. But I understand that here the focus is the control about how reliable and trustworthy the sources of information are. Well, maybe in an anti-scientific way of living I usually do not check sources. Call me too inocent, too stupid or whatever but I base my relationships in trust, taking for granted that what is said is true and that cases of misinformation do not take long to be discovered, meaning that exposed lies are harmful for the reputation of any organization, company or like.

How do you know if food science associations and networks provide reliable resources?

As a food science professional, you may want to stay updated on the latest trends, research, and opportunities in your field. One way to do that is to join food science associations and networks that offer various resources, such as publications, webinars, events, and forums. But how do you know if these resources are reliable and trustworthy? How can you avoid falling for misinformation, bias, or scams? Here are some tips to help you evaluate the quality and credibility of food science associations and networks.

1 Check the source

The first step is to check the source of the information. Who is behind the association or network? What is their mission, vision, and values? How do they select and verify their members and contributors? How do they fund their activities and disclose their sponsors? Look for evidence of transparency, accountability, and professionalism. Avoid sources that are vague, secretive, or self-promoting.

Add your perspective

Mehrdad Arjmandi

Polymer Specialist (Polyurethane chemist )
Report contribution
Drawing from my experience attending various conferences, I recall once being captivated by an intriguing study from a lesser-known association. However, upon delving into its origins, the lack of transparency was evident. This article aptly highlights the significance of due diligence in the food science sector. Evaluating the credibility of sources is paramount, not just for our professional growth but to ensure the reliability and safety of the information we consume and disseminate.

Like
Ivan Velimirovic

A Pharmacist, to the core.
Report contribution
Perhaps this is known to everyone, but I'll say it anyway. A study in the USA several years ago, including over 20,000 test subjects, shown that kids who drank cow milk are 3-6cm TALLER than ones who drank avocado, soy - in short any replacement. By examining the sponsors, there was only one - National Association of Farmers...

Like

2 Compare the information

The second step is to compare the information with other sources. How does it align with the current scientific consensus and standards? How does it acknowledge and address different perspectives and controversies? How does it cite and reference its sources and data? Look for evidence of accuracy, consistency, and objectivity. Avoid sources that are outdated, contradictory, or unsupported.

Add your perspective

Mehrdad Arjmandi

Polymer Specialist (Polyurethane chemist )
Report contribution
Reflecting on my years in the food science domain, I once encountered a compelling article that deviated considerably from mainstream findings. It taught me the importance of cross-referencing. This piece resonates with that experience, underscoring the need for accuracy and consistency in our information. Just as we scrutinize ingredients in a recipe, it's essential to assess the credibility of research sources, ensuring that the knowledge we imbibe is both current and objectively validated.

Like

3 Assess the relevance

The third step is to assess the relevance of the information for your needs and goals. How does it relate to your specific area of interest and expertise? How does it help you solve a problem or answer a question? How does it inspire you to learn more or take action? Look for evidence of applicability, usefulness, and value. Avoid sources that are irrelevant, superficial, or redundant.

Add your perspective

4 Review the feedback

The fourth step is to review the feedback from other users and experts. How do they rate and review the association or network? How do they comment and interact with the information? How do they share and apply the information in their own contexts? Look for evidence of engagement, satisfaction, and impact. Avoid sources that are ignored, criticized, or misused.

Add your perspective

5 Update the information

The fifth step is to update the information regularly. How often does the association or network update and revise its resources? How do they inform and notify their users and subscribers? How do they respond to new developments and challenges in the field? Look for evidence of timeliness, responsiveness, and adaptability. Avoid sources that are stagnant, outdated, or irrelevant.

Add your perspective

6 Apply the information

The final step is to apply the information in your own practice and learning. How do you use the information to improve your skills and knowledge? How do you integrate the information with your existing resources and networks? How do you evaluate the outcomes and feedback of your application? Look for evidence of improvement, integration, and evaluation. Avoid sources that are unused, isolated, or ineffective.

Add your perspective

7 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?

Add your perspective

Touché Guimarães

Independent Business Owner at Toucheguy
Report contribution
I am no food science professional, in fact no science professional of any type. But I understand that here the focus is the control about how reliable and trustworthy the sources of information are. Well, maybe in an anti-scientific way of living I usually do not check sources. Call me too inocent, too stupid or whatever but I base my relationships in trust, taking for granted that what is said is true and that cases of misinformation do not take long to be discovered, meaning that exposed lies are harmful for the reputation of any organization, company or like.

Like

How do you know if food science associations and networks provide reliable resources?

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1 Check the source

2 Compare the information

3 Assess the relevance

4 Review the feedback

5 Update the information

6 Apply the information

7 Here’s what else to consider

Food Science

Rate this article

Thanks for your feedback

More articles on Food Science

More relevant reading

How do you know if food science associations and networks provide reliable resources?

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1 Check the source

2 Compare the information

3 Assess the relevance

4 Review the feedback

5 Update the information

6 Apply the information

7 Here’s what else to consider

Food Science

Rate this article

Thanks for your feedback

Explore Other Skills