A crucial decision-maker exits mid-project. How will you navigate the client's turbulent waters?
When a key decision-maker exits mid-project, it's crucial to maintain stability and confidence. Here’s how to adapt:
- Reassess the project scope and goals with remaining stakeholders to ensure alignment.
- Communicate transparently with the client about potential impacts and revised expectations.
- Proactively seek interim solutions or support to keep the project on track without losing momentum.
How have you managed a sudden change in your project team? Share your experiences.
A crucial decision-maker exits mid-project. How will you navigate the client's turbulent waters?
When a key decision-maker exits mid-project, it's crucial to maintain stability and confidence. Here’s how to adapt:
- Reassess the project scope and goals with remaining stakeholders to ensure alignment.
- Communicate transparently with the client about potential impacts and revised expectations.
- Proactively seek interim solutions or support to keep the project on track without losing momentum.
How have you managed a sudden change in your project team? Share your experiences.
-
"Adaptability is about the powerful difference between adapting to cope and adapting to win," says Max McKeown. When a key decision-maker exits mid-project, the first step is to stabilize communication by quickly identifying their interim replacement or successor. In my experience, setting up a meeting with the new contact to review project goals, progress, and upcoming decisions helps maintain momentum. Prepare clear documentation on all previous decisions, milestones, and outstanding tasks to bring them up to speed efficiently. A common mistake is assuming continuity; instead, proactively engage to rebuild trust and alignment, ensuring a smooth transition through the turbulence.
-
The situation in which a crucial decision maker leaves mid-project can be truly delicate, because it risks compromising not only the direction of the project, but also the client's trust and the quality of the final result. If the new decision maker asks for changes to the project, offer alternatives. Showing thoughtful options confirms your role as a strategic partner and facilitates communication of the consequences of changes. Managing decision maker change requires attention to communication, flexibility and accurate documentation. Being prepared and having a proactive approach can make the difference between a project that is slowed down and one that proceeds smoothly.
-
When a key decision-maker exits mid-project, we first ensure clear communication with the remaining stakeholders to understand their updated needs and expectations. We then assess the impact on the project and adjust the plan accordingly. Using agile principles, we break the project into smaller, more manageable sprints to maintain momentum. We reallocate resources where necessary and ensure proper knowledge transfer to avoid delays. Tools like Jira or Asana help us track changes and stay aligned. By maintaining transparency and focusing on short-term deliverables, we ensure steady progress despite the disruption.
-
Greg Lopes
Head of Product and Experience at levva | Innovation | Digital Strategy | Teacher at PUCC
Um fator fundamental é a documentação, tanto das decisões como do racional e dos resultados esperados. Com isso devemos correr para nos aproximar do novo tomador de decisões, entender quem é, seu histórico e fazer o mapeamento completo. Com isso devemos criar conexão apresentando o que tínhamos programado e pedir pra que ele nos ajude a reorganizar, melhor descobrir logo o que vai mudar, quanto antes a gente reajustar mais tempo teremos para executar.
-
When a key decision-maker leaves, someone must step in to guarantee that the vacancy is filled swiftly. To engage stakeholders and ensure alignment, it's important to bring everyone to the table and reiterate the plan, as-is status, and commitments from both sides. This is especially important at the midpoint of a project to ensure everyone understands the overall status, current progress, remaining tasks, and key decisions made. This will ensure that everyone understands the project's goals, scope,, and objectives. Identifying any unfinished issues from previous management and finding a suitable new owner will ensure that roles are clearly defined when you move forward.
-
When a key decision-maker exits mid-project, I work quickly to stabilize the situation. I connect with the client’s remaining team to reaffirm our project goals and ensure continuity. I gather insights on the new decision-making structure and identify who will be stepping in. Clear communication is critical, so I keep all parties updated on progress and any adjustments needed. By being proactive, flexible, and highly communicative, I help the client navigate the transition smoothly and keep the project on track.
-
When a crucial team member leaves during a projects progress it's essential to designate a contact person to steady the situation. Review the project objectives. Realign with stakeholders to confirm priorities. Keep communication channels open and track advancements for transparency. Be proactive, in tackling issues by proposing solutions and adjusting tactics to reduce interruptions and uphold client trust.
-
Start by ensuring continuity through a thorough review of the project’s progress and addressing any pending decisions or approvals. Clear documentation becomes critical to avoid knowledge gaps. Proactively engage with the client to identify the new point of contact or decision-making process, and schedule a meeting to align on priorities and expectations. Building trust quickly is essential; share transparent updates and demonstrate a strong understanding of the project’s objectives to reassure the client. Stay flexible and adaptive to accommodate the client’s adjustments while keeping the project on track. By maintaining focus and open communication, you can navigate the transition smoothly and ensure the project’s success.
-
keyman risk should always be calculated. Project planning has to be reorganised depending on the situation. The situation may correspond to a new project. But nobody is irreplaceable.
Rate this article
More relevant reading
-
Program ManagementHow can you create a team charter that clearly defines roles and expectations of team members?
-
Program ManagementWhat do you do if delegated tasks are not aligned with the overall program goals?
-
Personal CoachingHow can you ensure that everyone on your team is aligned with project objectives?
-
Program ManagementWhat are the best practices for identifying the right people to include in a program team?