Start by facilitating an open discussion about each other’s perspectives. Clearly articulate your concerns and encourage your partner to share theirs. Use data and case studies to support your arguments, providing context for potential risks and rewards. Identify shared goals and explore the implications of the opportunity for both parties. Consider conducting a risk assessment together, weighing benefits against risks to find a balanced approach. Discuss possible mitigation strategies for high-risk aspects. Aim for a collaborative solution that aligns with both partners' risk tolerance while keeping potential benefits in mind.

In a partnership debate over entering a high-risk market, I focused on balancing caution with opportunity. My partner was eager to dive in, while I was more risk-averse. To find common ground, I proposed a phased approach—starting small to test the waters while minimizing exposure. We backed our decision with data, analyzing both potential gains and losses. This compromise allowed us to take calculated risks, satisfying both perspectives. By blending strategic caution with ambition, we reached a decision that aligned with our long-term goals.

In my experience, clear communication is essential when debating risks. At EasyWeGo, my partner and I once disagreed about expanding into a new market. Breaking risks into categories (financial, operational) and reviewing past successes helped us consider both perspectives. For example, during our taxi service expansion, we piloted the service first before fully launching, reducing risk. I’ve also found aligning on overall goals useful. When integrating our eSIM service globally, focusing on our shared goal of expansion led to a phased strategy. We started small with low investment, monitored key metrics, and scaled gradually. This approach balanced risk and opportunity while keeping both of us aligned and comfortable with the decision.