Your testing coverage is compromised. How can you negotiate for more time to ensure quality?
When your testing coverage is at risk, securing additional time is crucial for maintaining quality. To negotiate effectively:
- Present data-driven arguments highlighting the risks of inadequate testing and the potential for costly errors.
- Propose a realistic revised timeline that includes buffer periods for unforeseen issues.
- Offer interim solutions or partial deliveries to demonstrate progress while ensuring thorough testing.
How have you successfully negotiated for more time in your projects?
Your testing coverage is compromised. How can you negotiate for more time to ensure quality?
When your testing coverage is at risk, securing additional time is crucial for maintaining quality. To negotiate effectively:
- Present data-driven arguments highlighting the risks of inadequate testing and the potential for costly errors.
- Propose a realistic revised timeline that includes buffer periods for unforeseen issues.
- Offer interim solutions or partial deliveries to demonstrate progress while ensuring thorough testing.
How have you successfully negotiated for more time in your projects?
-
Negotiating for more time in projects is like convincing your kid to share his/her favorite toy with a friend - it requires patience, and a bit of charm. Whereas, securing additional time in a project often requires a mix of diplomacy, data, and strategy. Below are the two main approaches that worked for me; First, I don't wait until the last minute to express concerns about testing coverage. One of the most essential skills for any tester is, you need to know when to ask for more funding, where to use that funding and how to save it. Moreover, I always present the risks of inadequate testing using data—such as defect trends, critical paths, and potential impact on end-users. A clear “what could go wrong” scenario often opens eyes. 🥊
-
To negotiate for more time, present the potential risks of compromised testing with clear examples of how they might impact product quality or user satisfaction. Emphasize the critical areas needing attention and explain how additional time will mitigate these risks. Lastly, align with stakeholders on the importance of delivering a robust, reliable product for long-term success.
-
To negotiate for more time to ensure quality, emphasize the risks of inadequate coverage by linking potential defects to business impacts, such as customer dissatisfaction or costly fixes post-release. Present data-driven insights, such as defect trends or test gaps, to justify the need for extended time. Offer a prioritized plan highlighting how additional time will focus on critical areas, balancing risk mitigation with project timelines. Reinforce that investing in quality upfront saves time and resources in the long run, ensuring a stable, reliable product.
-
Here are a few effective strategies to guarantee test case coverage: 1. Requirements-Based Testing Traceability Matrix: Build a requirements traceability matrix that links requirements to test cases. This makes sure that every requirement corresponds to the test coverage. User Stories: For Agile projects, ensure that each user story has associated acceptance criteria that are covered by test cases. 2. Code Coverage Analysis Use tools to analyze code coverage to identify untested parts of the code. 3. Test Design Techniques Equivalence Partitioning: Divide input data into equivalent partitions to reduce the number of test cases while ensuring coverage of all scenarios.
-
Explain how additional time for testing can save costs by preventing post-release defects, which are more expensive to fix. Suggest shifting the timeline slightly to allow for a higher-quality release.
-
When coverage is compromised I highlight the risks of missed tests and potential issues down the line and by emphasising the importance of thorough testing to ensure quality and avoid future setbacks.
-
Negotiating for more time to ensure quality starts with presenting data-driven insights. Highlight specific risks associated with compromised coverage, backed by metrics like defect trends or potential customer impact. Propose a prioritized testing plan, emphasizing critical areas that require additional focus. Align the request with business objectives, showing how extra time prevents costly post-release issues. Offer transparent trade-offs, such as phased releases or reduced scope, to demonstrate flexibility. Framing the discussion around protecting user trust and long-term success reinforces the value of thorough testing.
-
Best Practices for Improving Your Test Coverage Define clear objectives and goals. Identify critical areas for testing. Use a combination of testing methods. Continuously monitor and evaluate test coverage. Update test cases regularly. Test coverage is a team effort. Implement a code coverage tool.
-
When testing coverage is at risk, asking for more time is important to maintain quality. Start by explaining the risks of skipping proper testing, like bugs or costly mistakes later. Suggest a realistic new timeline that includes enough time for thorough testing. You can also offer to deliver part of the work first to show progress while finishing the rest properly. These steps show you care about delivering quality while keeping everyone informed and confident in the process.
Rate this article
More relevant reading
-
Materials ScienceHow can you manage expectations when faced with delays in receiving test results for new materials?
-
Program ManagementWhat are effective ways to negotiate with a stakeholder who won't compromise on program quality?
-
Process DesignHow can you effectively troubleshoot issues on a tight deadline?
-
Application DevelopmentWhat do you do if project requirements clash due to differing opinions?