I would encourage open discussions to understand each preference and find common ground. Then create a collaborative style guide that incorporates the best ideas, and use automated tools like linters for consistency. Regular code reviews and training sessions can reinforce the standards, while leading by example fosters a positive culture. The aim is to enhance collaboration and code quality while valuing individual contributions.

I start by facilitating open discussions where team members share their preferences and reasoning. I then work towards a compromise by creating a unified standard that incorporates best practices from everyone’s input. Finally, I document the agreed standards clearly and ensure they are enforced through code reviews and automated tools like linters or pre-commit hooks. This approach promotes consistency and team alignment.

Will finalize a standard coding conventions list and educate your team members & start watching all the pull requests through code review that who is still lacking if it's then clear confusions. Best part is set the polices in pipeline while creating pull request and implement code review tools like SonarQube or etc. to enforce to follow the coding guidelines otherwise reject the pull requests of code to merge into main branch & many more ways.

Following the below set of practices mostly helps to avoid conflicts Documenting the coding standard followed in the project often helps to avoid conflicts. Using tools like eslint, Resharper maintains the clean coding practices Encouraging group code reviews Adding new jobs which enforce the coding standards in the pipeline helps to automate the process

Conflicting coding standards can hinder team efficiency, but alignment is achievable with a structured approach. Start by analyzing team preferences and using data like code reviews or bug reports to identify best practices. Facilitate open discussions to uncover the rationale behind each preference, fostering collaboration. From there, create a compromise standard that integrates proven methods, document it clearly, and enforce it consistently. A unified coding standard not only reduces friction but also boosts code quality and team productivity.

To unify conflicting coding standards, I initiate an open team discussion, ensuring everyone's preferences are heard. We then agree on a standard, referencing industry best practices like Kotlin Style Guide. For example, if spacing is debated, we decide on a consistent format (e.g., 4 spaces) and document it. Clear communication and compromise ensure team alignment.

To unify coding standards, I start by facilitating open discussions where team members share their preferences and rationale. This helps identify commonalities while emphasizing the importance of consistency and industry best practices. Together, we select or create a standard style guide and use tools like linters to enforce it. Flexibility is key, allowing adjustments for team-specific needs while ensuring everyone is involved in decision-making to build consensus. The agreed standards are documented, and I provide training if needed. Regular reviews ensure the standards adapt to evolving requirements, fostering alignment, quality, and collaboration.