The first step is to acknowledge the client's concerns and maintain a open and professional communication channel. Schedule a meeting or discussion to thoroughly understand the reasons behind the rejection, ensuring to ask clarifying questions to pinpoint the specific issues or areas of concern. This helps to identify potential misalignments in expectations, technical requirements, or functional needs. Next, I would seek to clarify the client's design preferences, objectives, and performance metrics to gauge the gap between the proposed design and their vision. By doing so, I can recognize potential areas for redesign or optimization.

When a client rejects my electrical design, I actively seek their feedback to understand their concerns and clarify objectives. I then refine the design collaboratively, ensuring it aligns with their vision and exceeds expectations.

Create a glossary: Provide a list of terms and their simplified definitions to refer back to. Visual aids: Use diagrams and flowcharts to illustrate complicated processes.

1. Seek Detailed Feedback: Understand why the client rejected the design—whether it's due to functionality, budget, or complexity. 2. Analyze the Feedback: Identify key issues, such as technical gaps or miscommunications, and focus on the core problems. 3. Collaborate and Align Goals: Involve the client in the revision process to ensure the design better aligns with their needs and expectations. 4. Revise the Design: Make adjustments based on feedback, optimizing for cost, efficiency, and practicality. 5. Present the Revised Design Clearly: Explain how the revisions address concerns, highlighting improvements and simplifying the explanation. 6. Offer Alternative Solutions: Provide options with pros and cons, allowing flexibility