Last updated on Jul 20, 2024

What are some common sources of measurement error in qualitative data collection?

Measurement error is the difference between the true value of a phenomenon and the value obtained by a data collection method. It can affect the validity, reliability, and generalizability of qualitative research findings. In this article, you will learn about some common sources of measurement error in qualitative data collection and how to minimize them.

Find expert answers in this collaborative article

Selected by the community from 3 contributions. Learn more

1 Sampling error

Sampling error occurs when the sample of participants or cases does not represent the population of interest. It can lead to biased or inaccurate conclusions about the phenomenon under study. To reduce sampling error, you should use appropriate sampling techniques, such as purposive, stratified, or random sampling, and ensure that your sample size is adequate for your research questions and design.

Add your perspective

Ankesh Saxena

Podcaster @ The Collaborative Canvas | TRP Magazine | Learn and Grow | Market Research | Personal Branding | Consumer Insights | Sales | ESOMAR member | MRSI Member |
Report contribution
Common sources of measurement error in qualitative data collection include interviewer bias, where the researcher's perspectives influence responses; respondent bias, where participants provide socially desirable answers; transcription errors during data recording; misinterpretation of responses; and sampling bias, where the sample does not accurately represent the population. Additionally, environmental factors and poorly designed interview questions can also introduce measurement error.

Like

2 Instrument error

Instrument error refers to the flaws or limitations of the data collection tools or methods, such as interviews, observations, documents, or surveys. It can affect the quality, consistency, and relevance of the data. To avoid instrument error, you should design and test your data collection instruments carefully, and ensure that they are clear, reliable, valid, and aligned with your research objectives and theoretical framework.

Add your perspective

3 Observer error

Observer error arises from the biases, expectations, or interpretations of the researcher or the data collector. It can influence the way the data are collected, recorded, or analyzed. To prevent observer error, you should be aware of your own assumptions and preconceptions, and use strategies such as reflexivity, triangulation, peer debriefing, or member checking to enhance the credibility and trustworthiness of your data.

Add your perspective

Hunnar Ramwani

Business Strategy | Exports | Statistical Analysis, Machine Learning & Data Visualization
Report contribution
Inaccuracies in the healthcare database, particularly in patient data, are largely attributed to human errors during data collection. Despite having multiple algorithms to address this issue, it is crucial to automate the process in order to enhance accuracy and efficiency in the long run.

Like

4 Respondent error

Respondent error stems from the behavior, attitude, or perception of the participants or the sources of data. It can affect the accuracy, completeness, and honesty of the data. To overcome respondent error, you should establish rapport and trust with your participants, and ensure that they understand the purpose, scope, and confidentiality of your research. You should also use probing, clarifying, or follow-up questions to elicit rich and detailed responses.

Add your perspective

5 Transcription error

Transcription error occurs when the data are converted from one format to another, such as from audio or video recordings to text. It can result in missing, inaccurate, or distorted data. To minimize transcription error, you should use reliable and accurate transcription software or services, and check and edit the transcripts for errors, omissions, or inconsistencies. You should also use verbatim transcription to capture the nuances and meanings of the data.

Add your perspective

6 Coding error

Coding error happens when the data are categorized, labeled, or organized into themes or patterns. It can affect the validity, consistency, and comprehensiveness of the data analysis. To reduce coding error, you should use a systematic and transparent coding process, and use software or tools that can facilitate the coding and retrieval of the data. You should also use intercoder reliability checks or peer reviews to ensure the quality and reliability of your codes.

Add your perspective

7 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?

Add your perspective

Anuj Pandey

Data Scientist | Machine Learning Expert | Healthcare Analytics Innovator | Driving Business Impact with Advanced Analytics and Data-Driven Solutions
Report contribution
Common sources of measurement error in qualitative data collection include interviewer and respondent bias, recall inaccuracies, recording mistakes, ambiguous questions, sampling bias, and environmental distractions. These factors can skew data, making it crucial to design studies carefully to ensure reliable and valid results.

Like

What are some common sources of measurement error in qualitative data collection?

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1 Sampling error

2 Instrument error

3 Observer error

4 Respondent error

5 Transcription error

6 Coding error

7 Here’s what else to consider

Data Collection

Rate this article

Thanks for your feedback

More articles on Data Collection

More relevant reading