What are the performance and security implications of user-mode drivers?

Device drivers are software components that enable communication between the operating system and the hardware devices. Depending on the type of device and the level of access required, drivers can operate in either kernel mode or user mode. In this article, you will learn the differences between these two modes, and how they affect the performance and security of your system.

1 Kernel Mode Drivers

Kernel mode drivers run in the same memory space as the operating system kernel, which is the core component of the system that manages resources, processes, and security. This means that kernel mode drivers have direct access to the hardware and can perform faster and more efficiently than user mode drivers. However, this also means that kernel mode drivers have more power and responsibility, and can potentially cause system crashes, corruption, or compromise if they are faulty, malicious, or exploited.

Add your perspective

Sudhir Mathane
Report contribution
power and responsibility are bit subjective words -- I would stick to privileges as it is execution out of privileged mode. Perhaps worth mentioning kernel mode drivers & OS kernel runs at higher privileged mode than other components - usually called as ring 0 in x86 architecture or supervisor mode in ARM architecture

Like

2 User Mode Drivers

User mode drivers run in a separate memory space from the kernel, which is called the user mode. This means that user mode drivers have to communicate with the hardware through a special interface provided by the kernel, which is called the Windows Driver Model (WDM). This adds an extra layer of abstraction and protection, but also reduces the performance and functionality of the drivers. User mode drivers are more isolated and restricted, and can only affect their own processes if they fail or misbehave.

Add your perspective

Sudhir Mathane
Report contribution
While this is correct (User mode drivers run in a separate memory space from the kernel) - being explicit about what that separate memory space mean would be beneficial - lesser privileged than kernel mode, user mode is what ring3 on x86 architecture or user mode in ARM architecture

Like

3 Benefits of User Mode Drivers

Despite the performance and functionality drawbacks, user mode drivers have some advantages over kernel mode drivers. One of them is the ease of development and deployment. User mode drivers can be written in higher-level languages, such as C#, and can use common frameworks, such as .NET. They can also be installed and updated without requiring a system reboot, which improves the user experience and reduces downtime. Another benefit is the enhanced security and stability. User mode drivers are less likely to cause system-wide problems, and can be monitored and controlled by the operating system more effectively.

Add your perspective

Cheikh L. FALL, PhD

Embedded Systems Engineer
Report contribution
"They can also be installed and updated without requiring a system reboot...". This is misleading. The necessity to reboot a system upon kernel module update or installation depends on the type application. E.g. a Linux PCIe driver might require rebooting due to resource allocation constraints (hotplug/rescan not supported) while a USB kernel driver would not.

Like
Sudhir Mathane
Report contribution
Some minor corrections: micro kernel architecture will allow any OS to achieve this even for kernel mode components. Benefits besides ease of development & deployment, the ability to code in abstracted languages would be improved security because of inherently denied access to privileged resources

Like

4 Drawbacks of User Mode Drivers

On the other hand, user mode drivers have some limitations and challenges that kernel mode drivers do not face. One of them is the performance overhead. User mode drivers have to go through more steps and transitions to access the hardware, which can slow down the data transfer and increase the CPU usage. They also have less access to the hardware features and capabilities, which can limit their functionality and compatibility. Another drawback is the dependency and complexity. User mode drivers rely on the WDM interface and the kernel mode drivers that support it, which can introduce bugs and conflicts. They also have to deal with multiple processes and threads, which can increase the risk of errors and deadlocks.

Add your perspective

Girish Handral
Report contribution
There are few driver types in Linux kernel that appear like user mode drivers but follow the LDM framework for particular class of devices. For instance block drivers for storage class of devices, protocol drivers of networking class of devices. These sort of drivers strictly follow the framework hooks and rules for run time I/O of packets.

Like
Sudhir Mathane
Report contribution
WDM as interface is only in the windows world, but this statement is correct for other OS environments as well. Names of these interfaces would be different in different OSes. IOCTL is one fine (or bad depending on how one looks at it) example on user mode drivers talking to kernel modes.

Like

5 Choosing Between Kernel Mode and User Mode Drivers

The decision to use kernel mode or user mode drivers depends on several factors, such as the type of device, the level of performance, the degree of security, and the ease of development. Generally speaking, kernel mode drivers are more suitable for low-level devices that require high-speed and direct access to the hardware, such as graphics cards, network adapters, or storage controllers. User mode drivers are more suitable for high-level devices that do not need much interaction with the hardware, such as printers, scanners, or webcams. However, there are exceptions and trade-offs, and some devices can support both modes.

Add your perspective

Sudhir Mathane
Report contribution
The decision to develop a driver as user mode vs kernel mode should most importantly, rely on the level of privileges required than any other criteria

Like

6 Best Practices for User Mode Drivers

If you decide to use user mode drivers for your device, there are some best practices that you should follow to ensure optimal performance and security. You should use the latest version of the WDM interface and Windows Driver Frameworks, minimize data transfers between the user mode and kernel mode, avoid blocking or waiting for long operations in your driver code, implement proper error handling and logging mechanisms, and test your driver thoroughly and regularly with tools such as Driver Verifier. Doing so can reduce overhead and latency, prevent responsiveness issues and resource starvation, and help diagnose and fix problems.

Add your perspective

Peter Lyons Kehl

Rust Software Engineer; Investor; Speaker at Rustlang Conf42; Technical Reviewer; Loving Rust
Report contribution
If the driver can use data structures with single ownership (known as RAII in C++), rather than bidirectional lists, cyclic graphs... then you may like Rust. It enforces memory and thread safety. It has a good ecosystem of libraries (known as crates). Of course, it can invoke C code through FFI. Rust tools support automation (cargo test) and linting (cargo and cargo clippy). Error messages are descriptive and often with fix suggestions. Tools for embedded deployment & debugging, too. (Currently Rust is available only for architectures supported by LLVM. But that's most mainstream architectures.)

Like

What are the performance and security implications of user-mode drivers?

1

2

3

4

5

6

1 Kernel Mode Drivers

2 User Mode Drivers

3 Benefits of User Mode Drivers

4 Drawbacks of User Mode Drivers

5 Choosing Between Kernel Mode and User Mode Drivers

6 Best Practices for User Mode Drivers

Device Drivers

Rate this article

Thanks for your feedback

More articles on Device Drivers

More relevant reading