How do you respond to peer reviewers' comments and suggestions?

Creating Knowledge As an academic researcher, your role is to drive change by bringing something new to the table, while respecting the foundations of the scientific method: Making observations➡️Asking questions➡️Doing background research➡️Formulating strong and testable hypotheses➡️Designing experiments to test them➡️Analysing results➡️Making provable conclusions➡️Communicating results/Peer review process. The purpose of the peer review process is to assess fairly and equitably the quality, originality and suitability of your manuscript before its official publication, that is why it is important to respond to peer review feedback professionally and objectively to improve the quality of your work by rethinking your approach.

Begin by thanking them and acknowledging their efforts. Address each comment individually, agreeing and implementing changes where necessary. Clearly explain modifications and their impact on the manuscript. If you disagree, provide a reasoned response supported by evidence. Maintain a professional tone throughout, avoiding defensiveness. Seek clarification if needed. Emphasize positive changes resulting from their suggestions, demonstrating the value of their input. Proofread your response for clarity and correctness. Overall, the aim is to enhance the manuscript's quality through thoughtful engagement with reviewers' feedback.

Understanding the feedback provided by peer reviewers is essential for improving the quality of your research manuscript. Begin by carefully reading each comment and suggestion to grasp the reviewer's perspective. Pay close attention to specific points raised, whether they commend strengths or highlight areas for improvement. Analyze the feedback objectively, considering how it aligns with the goals of your study and the standards of your field. Look for patterns or recurring themes in the reviewers' comments to identify key areas requiring attention. By approaching the feedback with an open mind and a critical eye, you can gain valuable insights to enhance the clarity, validity, and impact of your work.

Take the time to carefully read through each peer reviewer's comments and suggestions. Ensure a clear understanding of their feedback before formulating your responses .Begin your response by expressing gratitude for the reviewers' time and effort in providing feedback. Acknowledge their contribution to improving the quality of your manuscript.

Revise And Devise To revise effectively your manuscript you need to design your plan, and most importantly, to wear objective lenses, it will help you magnify every object enough to see it in great detail; the next step would be to define what you want to change and establish priorities by creating a calendar that you respect rigorously while ensuring that you always complete each of your tasks meticulously. It is imperative to be honest with yourself while looking into your gaps, and don't be embarrassed to ask for help when you need it. Remember, humans are flawed. Together, we complete each other's gaps.

Planning your revisions after receiving peer reviewers' comments involves a structured approach to address each point raised systematically. Begin by categorizing the feedback into specific areas such as methodology, results, discussion, and language. Prioritize revisions based on the significance of the comments and their impact on the overall quality of the manuscript. Create a checklist or action plan outlining the revisions needed for each section, setting realistic timelines to ensure timely completion. Allocate sufficient time for thorough revisions, including additional experiments or analyses if required. Regularly review and update your progress to stay on track with the revision process.

I am Golam Mostofa a certified Digital Marketer,I'm here to promote your business by placing positive google Review. We are also used local IP address,local guide account and different devices.It's 100% Live or non drop.I can provide you Review from different device. USA/UK/Australia/Canada/Europe based ..

If revisions are necessary, clearly outline the changes you have made in response to each comment. Ensure that your revisions align with the reviewer's expectations.In your revised manuscript, use track changes or another method to highlight the specific changes made in response to the reviewers' comments. This makes it easier for the reviewers and editors to see the modifications.

As a researcher in the early stages of my career, I have an approach to addressing reviewers' comments: I create a two-column table, placing the comments in the first column and my responses in the second. This method enables clear communication with the reviewers, facilitating a more organized and transparent exchange of information.

Respond, Don't Offend Courtesy kills negativity, it is like an armor that you wear to protect yourself from negativity's attacks and poor communication, which increases your chances of success. Don't be distracted by criticism, focus on what matters most: your goal. Don't wait for everyone to applaud you, respond to their feedback with diplomacy and grace, and thank them for their time and attention while explaining your new approach, major changes, sources, arguments and new conclusions. Don't just present your work but learn how to value it with a touch of humility, genuineness and grace.

Craft a professional and courteous response to each reviewer. Acknowledge their feedback and thank them for their time and effort. Clearly explain the changes you have made and the reasons behind them. If you disagree with a reviewer's suggestion, provide a thoughtful and evidence-based explanation for your stance.

When writing your response to peer reviewers' comments, be clear, concise, and respectful. Address each comment individually, acknowledging appreciation for their feedback. Provide detailed explanations for any clarifications needed and accept constructive criticism gracefully. Offer well-reasoned rebuttals if you disagree with certain points, but maintain a professional tone throughout. Outline the revisions made in response to the reviewers' comments, and express gratitude once again for their valuable input.

Don't Repeat Yourself Make sure to add something new and valuable to your revised manuscript and learn from your past mistakes. Don't lose focus, concentrate on the journal's guidelines, peer feedback, grammar, spelling, punctuation rules, and keep tight control of your arguments by verifying their validity and soundness. My own tactic: Learn by-heart your arguments to stay on track and wear them like water.

Checking your revisions is crucial to ensure that you have effectively addressed the peer reviewers' comments. Begin by reviewing each revised section to verify that you have addressed all points raised by the reviewers. Check for consistency, clarity, and coherence throughout the manuscript. Verify that any additional experiments or analyses have been correctly integrated. Pay close attention to formatting, citations, and references to ensure compliance with the journal's guidelines. Finally, solicit feedback from colleagues or mentors to gain fresh perspectives on the revised manuscript. By thoroughly checking your revisions, you can enhance the quality and impact of your research before resubmission.

Respect the Process Submitting your revised manuscript with your response to the journal editor doesn't mean that your mission has been completed, you need to prepare yourself for any question or request from your reviewers or the editor and keep a copy of everything you judge it important and might be needed in the future.

Submitting your revisions involves carefully following the journal's instructions for resubmission. Ensure that you have addressed all the peer reviewers' comments and incorporated necessary revisions into your manuscript. Double-check that your revised manuscript adheres to the journal's formatting and submission guidelines. Prepare a concise cover letter summarizing the revisions made and responding to each of the reviewers' comments. Upload the revised manuscript, cover letter, and any supplementary materials through the journal's submission portal. Confirm that all required documents have been successfully submitted before the deadline. Finally, await confirmation of receipt from the journal's editorial office.

Master Your Emotions Negative emotions have the power to hold you back and destroy your dreams. The day you tell yourself that you can be the CEO of your emotions, you will notice that success will smile at you. Understanding the peer review process while mastering your emotions will help you handle every situation with maturity, calm and intelligence. Learn how to turn every bad wind in your favor.

Not Everything As It Seems Feedback is not your enemy but a friend wearing a lounge suit that you don't like at first sight, but when you listen and understand the purpose behind every word you have heard, you feel a smile in your heart that activates your brain, then you say it loud: yes! It is time to improve it! NB Only those who really care, who want to bring out the best in you.

I recently attended a Moderation meeting of a Self Assessment reports by two contractors. Now prior to sitting at the SAR moderation, I had presented my own SAR after having written it for the first time. This is what I learnt about both experiences. Don't approach it from your angle, own agenda Respond to what has been written and check for the reasoning, critical skills. Intent and impact Be curious and ask about what they mean Acknowledge the great work Help them look for more opportunities/ examples to highlight the great practice and strengths 💪🏿 Help them outline any learnings and targets to take forward Make it balanced The organisations were so appreciated of our conversation, curiousity and help given. 3rd Eye

Respondo aos comentários e sugestões dos revisores com mente aberta, encarando-os como uma oportunidade de aprimorar o trabalho, e não necessariamente como críticas. Avalio cuidadosamente cada ponto e, sempre que possível, implemento as sugestões. Quando discordo de algo ou não é possível modificar algum ponto, procuro justificar de forma educada, apresentando argumentos claros e embasados. Essa abordagem colabora para uma resposta construtiva e para a qualidade final do trabalho que poderá ser publicado naquele periódico.