How can you synthesize research from multiple disciplines?

Synthesizing research from multiple disciplines starts with a clear understanding of your main research question, which helps you identify relevant insights across fields. Begin by reviewing literature from each discipline individually, noting key theories, methods, and findings. Look for connections or commonalities between them, such as shared concepts, complementary methodologies, or parallel findings that can be integrated. Next, identify gaps or inconsistencies and consider how perspectives from one discipline might address limitations in another. Organize your synthesis around key themes that bridge these fields, which will help readers understand how they connect.

The best way would be to go with a step-by-step process which involves individual attention to each part as well as an overall understanding of overlaps, gaps and insights : Familiarize Yourself with Each Field: Learn the main concepts and approaches specific to each area. Identify Overlaps: Pinpoint shared themes, issues, or objectives that link the disciplines. Merge Insights: Combine ideas and findings to develop a more inclusive perspective or solution. Evaluate Gaps: Highlight inconsistencies or unanswered questions between the fields. Present a Unified Outcome: Organize the information to create a cohesive and practical result. This method enables a more well-rounded understanding.

Muito bom! Incluiria também que seria interessante fazer as pesquisas em cada disciplina separadamente, depois montar uma estrutura organizada citando os pontos importantes de cada conteúdo pesquisado.

I'll take a loftier viewpoint on what I believe to be a bigger question that is recognizerd here: Why would you want to synthesize research from multiple disciplines? Because of the learning penalty! As researchers dive deeper into the details of a specific discipline, they can become blind or biased abount fundamental assumptions -stifling discovery with limiting beliefs generated to relieve the discomfort when basse assumptions are challenged. Interdiciplinary research is an excitng approach. When exploring an old ideas from the perspective of a different domain everything is new again and we see more. This is where unexpected patterns and breakthrough discoveries emerge and we see a bigger picture. Look at the big picture;

My approach has always been to synthesize research from multiple disciplines in a structured way. Begin by identifying clear and focused research questions that inherently require insights from various fields. This involves conducting preliminary research to understand existing literature, pinpointing gaps in current knowledge, and utilizing frameworks like PICO or SPIDER to structure the research question.

When I'm evaluating source credibility and relevance I assess the quality and relevance of sources by considering the methodologies used, the reputation of the journals, and the impact of the findings within their respective fields. There are structured approaches to doing this like: The CRAAP test (Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose) and the P.R.O.V.E.N. method (Purpose, Relevance, Objectivity, Verifiability, Expertise, and Newness)